<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cognitive Code at TC40</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/17/cognitive-code-at-tc40/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/17/cognitive-code-at-tc40/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:42:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Forrest Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/17/cognitive-code-at-tc40/comment-page-1/#comment-436858</link>
		<dc:creator>Forrest Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/17/cognitive-code-at-tc40/#comment-436858</guid>
		<description>The video had only this to say about how it works (at times 1:45 to 2:05):
    1. Direct training
    2. strong AI techniques for conceptual transformation
    3. actual brain uses genetic algorithms
    4. mumble? mumble? cellular automata

I can&#039;t think of what they could possibly be using the CA for.

There are 15 patents, here&#039;s the only 2 I could find:
   http://www.patentmonkey.com/PM/searchresults/Default.aspx
   http://www.patentmonkey.com/PM/patentid/20030225829.aspx

I haven&#039;t found any serious discussion of this anywhere on the web.

My sense is that this system has very little &quot;smarts&quot;, in the sense of actually being able to solve problems at the level of state of the art machine learning. 

Does anyone know how deep this is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The video had only this to say about how it works (at times 1:45 to 2:05):<br />
    1. Direct training<br />
    2. strong AI techniques for conceptual transformation<br />
    3. actual brain uses genetic algorithms<br />
    4. mumble? mumble? cellular automata</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t think of what they could possibly be using the CA for.</p>
<p>There are 15 patents, here&#8217;s the only 2 I could find:<br />
   <a href="http://www.patentmonkey.com/PM/searchresults/Default.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.patentmonkey.com/PM/searchresults/Default.aspx</a><br />
   <a href="http://www.patentmonkey.com/PM/patentid/20030225829.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.patentmonkey.com/PM/patentid/20030225829.aspx</a></p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t found any serious discussion of this anywhere on the web.</p>
<p>My sense is that this system has very little &#8220;smarts&#8221;, in the sense of actually being able to solve problems at the level of state of the art machine learning. </p>
<p>Does anyone know how deep this is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forrest Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/17/cognitive-code-at-tc40/comment-page-1/#comment-436833</link>
		<dc:creator>Forrest Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/17/cognitive-code-at-tc40/#comment-436833</guid>
		<description>The video had only this to say about how it works (at times 1:45 to 2:05):
    1. Direct training
    2. strong AI techniques for conceptual transformation
    3. actual brain uses genetic algorithms
    4. mumble mumble cellular automata (anyone make this out?)

I can&#039;t think of what they could possibly be using the CA for, can you?

Does anyone know how deep this is? All I got from the website is that they have fully separated the &quot;thinking&quot; from the language part. So language inputs are converted into data structures, manipulated, and then translated back out to English. Ie, it should be possible to bolt on other languages.

I haven&#039;t seen any serious discussion of this anywhere on the web.

My sense is that this system has very little &quot;smarts&quot;, in the sense of solving problems such as those handled by state of the art ML techniques.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The video had only this to say about how it works (at times 1:45 to 2:05):<br />
    1. Direct training<br />
    2. strong AI techniques for conceptual transformation<br />
    3. actual brain uses genetic algorithms<br />
    4. mumble mumble cellular automata (anyone make this out?)</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t think of what they could possibly be using the CA for, can you?</p>
<p>Does anyone know how deep this is? All I got from the website is that they have fully separated the &#8220;thinking&#8221; from the language part. So language inputs are converted into data structures, manipulated, and then translated back out to English. Ie, it should be possible to bolt on other languages.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t seen any serious discussion of this anywhere on the web.</p>
<p>My sense is that this system has very little &#8220;smarts&#8221;, in the sense of solving problems such as those handled by state of the art ML techniques.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forrest Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/17/cognitive-code-at-tc40/comment-page-1/#comment-436830</link>
		<dc:creator>Forrest Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/17/cognitive-code-at-tc40/#comment-436830</guid>
		<description>Another patent on this technology is here:

http://www.patentmonkey.com/PM/patentid/20030225829.aspx

There are supposed to be 15 patents, but I can&#039;t find the other 12. I forget where to look for those that have been filed but not yet granted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another patent on this technology is here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.patentmonkey.com/PM/patentid/20030225829.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.patentmonkey.com/PM/patentid/20030225829.aspx</a></p>
<p>There are supposed to be 15 patents, but I can&#8217;t find the other 12. I forget where to look for those that have been filed but not yet granted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Chen COO</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/17/cognitive-code-at-tc40/comment-page-1/#comment-430631</link>
		<dc:creator>John Chen COO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/17/cognitive-code-at-tc40/#comment-430631</guid>
		<description>Blake
I assure you that the software is everything that we describe and then some.
At some point we would welcome a discussion of the technology and all of its implications.

Thanks for the mention.

Best

John Chen COO

Cognitive Code Corporation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blake<br />
I assure you that the software is everything that we describe and then some.<br />
At some point we would welcome a discussion of the technology and all of its implications.</p>
<p>Thanks for the mention.</p>
<p>Best</p>
<p>John Chen COO</p>
<p>Cognitive Code Corporation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
