<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Presentation Unveiled, M$ Runs The Other Way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/18/presentation-unveiled-m-runs-the-other-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/18/presentation-unveiled-m-runs-the-other-way/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:27:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Ha</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/18/presentation-unveiled-m-runs-the-other-way/comment-page-1/#comment-435437</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Ha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/18/presentation-unveiled-m-runs-the-other-way/#comment-435437</guid>
		<description>^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quentin Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/18/presentation-unveiled-m-runs-the-other-way/comment-page-1/#comment-434113</link>
		<dc:creator>Quentin Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 02:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/18/presentation-unveiled-m-runs-the-other-way/#comment-434113</guid>
		<description>I thought it was one of those ironic posts, because google&#039;s offering is hardly competitive, I think they have a long way to go</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was one of those ironic posts, because google&#8217;s offering is hardly competitive, I think they have a long way to go</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Ha</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/18/presentation-unveiled-m-runs-the-other-way/comment-page-1/#comment-432995</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Ha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/18/presentation-unveiled-m-runs-the-other-way/#comment-432995</guid>
		<description>Well, hey there, Scott. The point of my post on Presentation was that it was readily available to the masses. It was in no way, shape or form meant to be a review of any sort. If I were allotted a few extra minutes in my day I could possibly give it an honest try and give a full review, but sadly that isn&#039;t so. I&#039;m sure Presentation pales in comparison to PowerPoint at the moment since that&#039;s the case with Docs, but given some time I&#039;m sure it&#039;ll be worth the hassle. The obvious benefit so far is that  it&#039;s available online, all the time. No need to bring a thumb drive that could be lost or improperly formatted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, hey there, Scott. The point of my post on Presentation was that it was readily available to the masses. It was in no way, shape or form meant to be a review of any sort. If I were allotted a few extra minutes in my day I could possibly give it an honest try and give a full review, but sadly that isn&#8217;t so. I&#8217;m sure Presentation pales in comparison to PowerPoint at the moment since that&#8217;s the case with Docs, but given some time I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;ll be worth the hassle. The obvious benefit so far is that  it&#8217;s available online, all the time. No need to bring a thumb drive that could be lost or improperly formatted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/18/presentation-unveiled-m-runs-the-other-way/comment-page-1/#comment-432809</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/18/presentation-unveiled-m-runs-the-other-way/#comment-432809</guid>
		<description>Now had you written something like this, you&#039;d have written something of value to your readers:
http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/18/google-presentations-misses-the-mark/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now had you written something like this, you&#8217;d have written something of value to your readers:<br />
<a href="http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/18/google-presentations-misses-the-mark/" rel="nofollow">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/18/google-presentations-misses-the-mark/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/18/presentation-unveiled-m-runs-the-other-way/comment-page-1/#comment-432784</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/18/presentation-unveiled-m-runs-the-other-way/#comment-432784</guid>
		<description>Hi, Peter.  Your obvious bia$es aside, what would be a more useful post, and of more value to your readers, is an article about the differences between the two applications.  Also, perhaps a little background on your experiences using Google&#039;s &quot;Presentation&quot; program (I&#039;m sure you must have given it a good test run before declaring its superiority over PowerPoint).  

Although I find CrunchGear to be a very biased site, and the articles too often lacking in both depth and reliability, every once in a while, there&#039;s something worth reading.  That&#039;s why I keep coming back to do a quick scroll, looking for anything of value.  A post that offered some insight into &quot;Presentation&quot; would have been of value; your post was of absolutely no value at all.  Why did you even bother?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Peter.  Your obvious bia$es aside, what would be a more useful post, and of more value to your readers, is an article about the differences between the two applications.  Also, perhaps a little background on your experiences using Google&#8217;s &#8220;Presentation&#8221; program (I&#8217;m sure you must have given it a good test run before declaring its superiority over PowerPoint).  </p>
<p>Although I find CrunchGear to be a very biased site, and the articles too often lacking in both depth and reliability, every once in a while, there&#8217;s something worth reading.  That&#8217;s why I keep coming back to do a quick scroll, looking for anything of value.  A post that offered some insight into &#8220;Presentation&#8221; would have been of value; your post was of absolutely no value at all.  Why did you even bother?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coleman Foley</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/18/presentation-unveiled-m-runs-the-other-way/comment-page-1/#comment-432758</link>
		<dc:creator>Coleman Foley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/18/presentation-unveiled-m-runs-the-other-way/#comment-432758</guid>
		<description>oh yeah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh yeah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
