Comments on: AmazonMP3’s Watermarks Are Nothing To Be Concerned About (Yet) http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/26/amazonmp3s-watermarks-are-nothing-to-be-concerned-about-yet/ Gadgets, gear and computer hardware. Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:49:28 -0500 hourly 1 By: Jason http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/26/amazonmp3s-watermarks-are-nothing-to-be-concerned-about-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-453873 Jason Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:36:17 +0000 http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/26/amazonmp3s-watermarks-are-nothing-to-be-concerned-about-yet/#comment-453873 Do you have anything to back up that "they'll track us next week" statement? Do you have anything to back up that “they’ll track us next week” statement?

]]> By: Chuck http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/09/26/amazonmp3s-watermarks-are-nothing-to-be-concerned-about-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-451635 Chuck Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:09:51 +0000 http://crunchgear.com/2007/09/26/amazonmp3s-watermarks-are-nothing-to-be-concerned-about-yet/#comment-451635 Nicholas, How did you do this comparison??. Is the original audio track from the CD, or did you try to encode it the same way that the would be provided from Amazon but without the watermark? If the watermarked file is from Amazon and the original non watermarked file is from a CD then it would seem that you are also seeing the compression differences as well as any watermark data. Nicholas,

How did you do this comparison??. Is the original audio track from the CD, or did you try to encode it the same way that the would be provided from Amazon but without the watermark?

If the watermarked file is from Amazon and the original non watermarked file is from a CD then it would seem that you are also seeing the compression differences as well as any watermark data.

]]>