Bose Computer MusicMonitor Review

Bose Computer MusicMonitor
What’s insanely small and costs way too much? A diamond. What else? Bose’s new Computer MusicMonitor desktop speakers — but they sure are shiny with their silvery aluminum finish. Bose cleverly combined two ingenious ideas and added a little DSP magic to make what are quite possibly the finest speakers of their size. Of course, all that science costs money: These tiny speakers will run you $399 a pair, and a travel case costs an extra $59!

Full review after the jump.

Brushed-aluminum cases are all the rage these days thanks to Apple, but Bose took it a step further and used stiff metal to help dampen vibrations. Each silver-grilled speaker measures a barely-there 4.8 by 3.8 by 2.5 inches and is angled about 15 degrees upward, which is handy for a desktop or low table.

Inside each speaker is a small tweeter and a pair of opposing passive radiators — woofers that move in opposite directions — squeezing air (sound) between them and out .5 by 2-inch slots on either side. That means bass and mids get dispersed horizontally, while the tweeters shoot the highs and upper mids straight out front. Combined with the sturdy enclosure and a DSP chip that beefs up the bass and the highs, this gives the Computer MusicMonitors surprisingly clear and full sound even at top volume.

The speakers match my MacBook Pro perfectly, which should help move a lot of these in Apple Stores. They also look pretty well-coordinated with the new aluminum-faced iMacs… or any silver/gray metallic computer, for that matter.

Setup is very simple: Plug the left speaker’s audio cable into the back of the right speaker. Note that the cable is not removable from the left speaker and has a proprietary connector, so you can only have the speakers a maximum of 6 feet apart. Of course, unless you have a truly enormous desk, this isn’t a big deal.

The AC power cord connects to the back of the right speaker, but the wall-wart plug is insanely huge. That’s partly because it has an integrated cable winder — good for travel, not so good for crowded outlets or power strips.

You can hook up any audio source to these speakers via the included eighth-inch to eighth-inch audio cable, though I was a bit surprised to see the cables connectors aren’t gold-plated. For nearly $400, you’d think Bose would spend a couple extra bucks on a classier (and less corrosion-prone) cable.

The included remote control is a simple three-button job. It handles power on/off and volume up/down, and that’s all she wrote.

I certainly wouldn’t call the sound “reference quality”, but it is very musical — meaning it’s warm and pleasant to listen to even though the sound isn’t as accurate as a good studio monitor. The overall sound is best for music listening, though the speakers aren’t bad for some types of movies. Gamers and action movie fans may not be impressed, though, since there isn’t a whole lot of low rumble.

Acoustic jazz like John Coltrane’s “Blue Train” sounds crisp and clear with bouncy bass and sparkly highs, though the piano gets a little lost during horn solos. Classical music retains a surprising amount of depth and richness, whether it’s a full orchestra or solo piano.

Rock fares very well on these speakers. Bands like Cake, the Killers, and Led Zeppelin all have plenty of crunch and thump, while guitars and effects pan, swirl, and shriek like they should. R&B and soul tracks do pretty well too; Stevie Wonder, Marvin Gaye, and Erykah Badu’s vocals all come through loud and clear, and the bass has only a little of that typical “Bose bloat.”

Electronica often has parts that are so deep, nearly all small speakers have trouble handling them. Bass Mekanik’s Faster, Harder, Louder and the Gorillaz self-titled album both have some impressively low bass, and the MusicMonitors basically choked, though you I could feel them vibrating when I touched them. This is exactly what makes these a poor fit for games and movie explosions.

Volume-wise, these will fill a small room (think dens or home offices) and don’t distort appreciably even at top volume. But they’re definitely made for near-field listening while you’re sitting at your desk.

Overall, it’s hard to recommend these given their high price and lack of versatility. The main thing they have going for them is their tiny size, which Bose seems to think will appeal to laptop and desktop users alike. But perhaps they haven’t heard the venerable Klipsch ProMedia 2.0, which are damn impressive portables and cost under $100.

The science behind these speakers is pretty cool, and Bose learned from its Herbie Hancock-hawked Wave systems that blinding people with science can actually sell products. Still, Bose should have included a subwoofer output and cut the price in half if they wanted a runaway hit. Lucky for them they can sell just about anything on the Bose name alone.

  •   

5 Comments so far

 
no image
Rey (Who am I?)

When I first hooked up my new Bose Computer Monitor speakers to my Apple 15in G4 laptop, I was not too impressed. The highs were okay but the bass was weak. I tried ramping up the bass using the equalizer in iTunes and it did not help much. Then I switched on the SRS iWow plugin and voila! sound was transformed and the bass is kickin’. If you are not satisfied with these speakers it probably is not the speakers fault but what you have as your sound source.

 
no image
Ken (Who am I?)

Thanks for the iWow tip! It not only helps with the Bose speakers but really increases the quality and output of music from the macbook’s teeny speakers. Thx

 
no image
Pete (Who am I?)

These are excellent speakers for a laptop. **But** they sound **much much better** with a **grade “5″ Minicable from Audioquest (about $125)** rather than the cheap minicable which comes with the speakers. Incredibly rich sounding difference. Have so hooked up a set at home and also on my desktop computer at the office. Excellent sound - acoustic/light jazz music. (Don’t need thundering bass 1.5 feet from my ears.) Small speakers are convenient. Well worth the bucks!

 
no image
jawbone (Who am I?)

I took a quick look at Audioquest’s site.

They as much as say, “Who you gonna believe — us or your own lying ears?”

Their advertising slogan should be, “Audioquest..because you’ll believe anything.”

 
no image
Bob (Who am I?)

As usual, good advertising doesn’t mean a better product.
Though audio quest’s products do have a lot of nice features… You won’t notice a real benefit in the audible spectrum. Though solid conductors will help with what they call “strand interaction”… this happens well above the human (or even a bat’s) audible spectrum (think MHz). The same goes for PSC+. Where nicks in the cable can wreak havoc on high frequency signals, these are also WELL out of anything the human hear can detect (again thing HIGH MHz-GHz range, not sub 20Khz range). The thing that WILL get better BASS from the system is (as Pete said) is use a 3.5mm interconnect with a larger conductor. Also, the addition of a gold plated plug is a VERY small (read insignificant) difference. It is almost entirely aesthetic. Though gold’s resistance is about 3 times better than the nickel (or in some cases Beryllium-copper connectors. The size of the connector coupled with the length of the (normally copper) cord makes the connector plating a moot point. Just look for a cord from a reputable company (Not Monster either). Other than that it’s either the source or the speaker to blame. Sorry for the rant… I’ve just gotten tired of people talking about people spending (a lot) more money on cable than what they need to. But if spending that much on a cable makes you feel good…. I’m selling Silver conductor Power cables for computer…. Will make you computer run twice as fast…. (I’m joking)

Trackbacks/Pings

No trackbacks or pings yet.

Leave a Comment

« Back to text comment

Comment template by SezWho

CrunchGear Sponsors