<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LucidTouch: See-through UIs come to life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/10/12/lucidtouch-see-through-uis-come-to-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/10/12/lucidtouch-see-through-uis-come-to-life/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:06:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ProfessionalGun</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/10/12/lucidtouch-see-through-uis-come-to-life/comment-page-1/#comment-477795</link>
		<dc:creator>ProfessionalGun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/10/12/lucidtouch-see-through-uis-come-to-life/#comment-477795</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m appreciative of the fact that you don&#039;t have to jack up your screen with fingerprints. . . .  I think any time you have an input method that a) doesn&#039;t mandate that you introduce noise (skin oils, potential scratches) onto the display and b) doesn&#039;t force you to block your own view of the screen with each input - is a good thing.  That said - in this particular prototype, I&#039;m not thrilled that the device must be used with 2 hands for full control of the screen.  

I think it looks like exciting upcoming technology!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m appreciative of the fact that you don&#8217;t have to jack up your screen with fingerprints. . . .  I think any time you have an input method that a) doesn&#8217;t mandate that you introduce noise (skin oils, potential scratches) onto the display and b) doesn&#8217;t force you to block your own view of the screen with each input &#8211; is a good thing.  That said &#8211; in this particular prototype, I&#8217;m not thrilled that the device must be used with 2 hands for full control of the screen.  </p>
<p>I think it looks like exciting upcoming technology!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/10/12/lucidtouch-see-through-uis-come-to-life/comment-page-1/#comment-477678</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/10/12/lucidtouch-see-through-uis-come-to-life/#comment-477678</guid>
		<description>I rather like the idea... it&#039;s like going from pen/paper to a keyboard, with this device, you can be far more efficient not only visually but input wise. This would be neat for video games.

Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rather like the idea&#8230; it&#8217;s like going from pen/paper to a keyboard, with this device, you can be far more efficient not only visually but input wise. This would be neat for video games.</p>
<p>Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
