<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slingbox Solo is like witchcraft to old folks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/01/slingbox-solo-is-like-withcraft-to-old-folks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/01/slingbox-solo-is-like-withcraft-to-old-folks/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:46:50 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Marquez</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/01/slingbox-solo-is-like-withcraft-to-old-folks/comment-page-1/#comment-506284</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Marquez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/11/01/slingbox-solo-is-like-withcraft-to-old-folks/#comment-506284</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s three paragraphs and a loose sentence... Is it really that hard to proof this before it goes live?

Title: &quot;withcraft&quot; I assume should be &quot;witchcraft&quot; (how did that get past a spell check?

WTF is this sentence?: &quot;Once you parse through all the hand-holding—high def signal use component cables, my Linksys router is giving me trouble—you’re left with very little.&quot;


&quot;over&quot; should be &quot;our&quot; in this bit: &quot;though over very own Blake had some problems.&quot;

I mean... COME ON!?!  I normally don&#039;t nit-pick about these things, but this is just sad for being less then even a paraphrase of an article on another website.  We come here expecting professionalism and some modicum of journalistic ability, it seems that as TC grows, the writing integrity goes downhill.  It&#039;s not like this was a scoop that was time sensitive or anything...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s three paragraphs and a loose sentence&#8230; Is it really that hard to proof this before it goes live?</p>
<p>Title: &#8220;withcraft&#8221; I assume should be &#8220;witchcraft&#8221; (how did that get past a spell check?</p>
<p>WTF is this sentence?: &#8220;Once you parse through all the hand-holding—high def signal use component cables, my Linksys router is giving me trouble—you’re left with very little.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;over&#8221; should be &#8220;our&#8221; in this bit: &#8220;though over very own Blake had some problems.&#8221;</p>
<p>I mean&#8230; COME ON!?!  I normally don&#8217;t nit-pick about these things, but this is just sad for being less then even a paraphrase of an article on another website.  We come here expecting professionalism and some modicum of journalistic ability, it seems that as TC grows, the writing integrity goes downhill.  It&#8217;s not like this was a scoop that was time sensitive or anything&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david pogue</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/01/slingbox-solo-is-like-withcraft-to-old-folks/comment-page-1/#comment-506186</link>
		<dc:creator>david pogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/11/01/slingbox-solo-is-like-withcraft-to-old-folks/#comment-506186</guid>
		<description>Hm. Well, your snarky summary--&quot;If there’s a quick way to sum up his many, many words, it’s this: the Solo works splendidly for less money than previous models&quot;--isn&#039;t actually true to my column.

Slingbox Solo is also smaller, it works with high-definition for the first time, it&#039;s now available for Symbian, it has pass-through for the first time, it will soon offer TiVo-like playback toys without a TiVo... actually, there&#039;s quite a bit new here. Not my fault if you missed it.

And finally, a small point: Yes, I do write for an audience for laymen. People who&#039;ve never heard of the Slingbox and could be forgiven for needing some help with the concept!

Having a Web site called Crunchgear.com call my column too basic is like a NASA scientist ridiculing an article that explains how airfoils generate lift. 

You&#039;re reading the wrong rag, dude.

--Pogue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm. Well, your snarky summary&#8211;&#8221;If there’s a quick way to sum up his many, many words, it’s this: the Solo works splendidly for less money than previous models&#8221;&#8211;isn&#8217;t actually true to my column.</p>
<p>Slingbox Solo is also smaller, it works with high-definition for the first time, it&#8217;s now available for Symbian, it has pass-through for the first time, it will soon offer TiVo-like playback toys without a TiVo&#8230; actually, there&#8217;s quite a bit new here. Not my fault if you missed it.</p>
<p>And finally, a small point: Yes, I do write for an audience for laymen. People who&#8217;ve never heard of the Slingbox and could be forgiven for needing some help with the concept!</p>
<p>Having a Web site called Crunchgear.com call my column too basic is like a NASA scientist ridiculing an article that explains how airfoils generate lift. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re reading the wrong rag, dude.</p>
<p>&#8211;Pogue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
