<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OS X Leopard review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/02/os-x-leopard-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/02/os-x-leopard-review/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:29:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: milkandtwo</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/02/os-x-leopard-review/comment-page-1/#comment-512739</link>
		<dc:creator>milkandtwo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 13:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/11/02/os-x-leopard-review/#comment-512739</guid>
		<description>can you elaborate on your experience with the g4 and noticeable changes in speed whether good or bad?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can you elaborate on your experience with the g4 and noticeable changes in speed whether good or bad?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes D</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/02/os-x-leopard-review/comment-page-1/#comment-511186</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 17:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/11/02/os-x-leopard-review/#comment-511186</guid>
		<description>Ha ha, thanks John - made my day - consider me covered in Meh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha, thanks John &#8211; made my day &#8211; consider me covered in Meh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Biggs</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/02/os-x-leopard-review/comment-page-1/#comment-511106</link>
		<dc:creator>John Biggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 16:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/11/02/os-x-leopard-review/#comment-511106</guid>
		<description>@wes D- Meh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@wes D- Meh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/02/os-x-leopard-review/comment-page-1/#comment-511104</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 16:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/11/02/os-x-leopard-review/#comment-511104</guid>
		<description>why do you have an application called Baby Banger?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why do you have an application called Baby Banger?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes D</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/02/os-x-leopard-review/comment-page-1/#comment-510251</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 00:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/11/02/os-x-leopard-review/#comment-510251</guid>
		<description>Are people still using &quot;Meh&quot;? It&#039;s so yesterday...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are people still using &#8220;Meh&#8221;? It&#8217;s so yesterday&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oz</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/02/os-x-leopard-review/comment-page-1/#comment-508386</link>
		<dc:creator>oz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/11/02/os-x-leopard-review/#comment-508386</guid>
		<description>&quot;When it has lots of items, you get sort of a cloud of unrelated items that is just overwhelming.&quot;

Since people would neither tend to stack a lot of &quot;unrelated&quot; items together nor have more than a screenful (if that many) of  icon-represented items that might benefit from being in a stack, the complaint about &quot;lots of items&quot; is not very meaningful. Frankly, I don&#039;t think most people would want to stack more than 20 or 30 items together if they&#039;re being true to the metaphor. (In real life, managing a stack with a large number of items is counterproductive, so trying that on the computer is not what one would expect.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;When it has lots of items, you get sort of a cloud of unrelated items that is just overwhelming.&#8221;</p>
<p>Since people would neither tend to stack a lot of &#8220;unrelated&#8221; items together nor have more than a screenful (if that many) of  icon-represented items that might benefit from being in a stack, the complaint about &#8220;lots of items&#8221; is not very meaningful. Frankly, I don&#8217;t think most people would want to stack more than 20 or 30 items together if they&#8217;re being true to the metaphor. (In real life, managing a stack with a large number of items is counterproductive, so trying that on the computer is not what one would expect.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shutup Man</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/02/os-x-leopard-review/comment-page-1/#comment-508134</link>
		<dc:creator>Shutup Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 20:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/11/02/os-x-leopard-review/#comment-508134</guid>
		<description>&quot;However, Leopard has improved overall OS X stability and my M-Audio hardware no longer randomly freezes my computer.&quot;

Is this because your computer no longer detects said M-Audio hardware? That seems to be the case for everyone else, including me.
There are no drivers that enable their products to work on OSX 10.5 yet (that I know of anyway, and I&#039;ve been looking!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;However, Leopard has improved overall OS X stability and my M-Audio hardware no longer randomly freezes my computer.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is this because your computer no longer detects said M-Audio hardware? That seems to be the case for everyone else, including me.<br />
There are no drivers that enable their products to work on OSX 10.5 yet (that I know of anyway, and I&#8217;ve been looking!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/02/os-x-leopard-review/comment-page-1/#comment-507822</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchgear.com/2007/11/02/os-x-leopard-review/#comment-507822</guid>
		<description>re: Spaces

I think you are being a bit harsh on Spaces.  Especially since two monitors are not exactly portable.  I have used and thrown out multiple desktop programs on Windows and Macs for years.  They were either too slow, too kludgy, gets in the way, or just plain didn&#039;t work.  Spaces is the first one that I find actually usable.   This type of application really needs to be built into the OS and Spaces proves it.  Its quick, switching between &#039;spaces&#039; is intuitive, and it doesn&#039;t get in the way.  Its the new feature I like most about leopard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: Spaces</p>
<p>I think you are being a bit harsh on Spaces.  Especially since two monitors are not exactly portable.  I have used and thrown out multiple desktop programs on Windows and Macs for years.  They were either too slow, too kludgy, gets in the way, or just plain didn&#8217;t work.  Spaces is the first one that I find actually usable.   This type of application really needs to be built into the OS and Spaces proves it.  Its quick, switching between &#8217;spaces&#8217; is intuitive, and it doesn&#8217;t get in the way.  Its the new feature I like most about leopard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
