<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Study says iPhone not great for txt messaging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/14/study-says-iphone-not-great-for-txt-messaging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/14/study-says-iphone-not-great-for-txt-messaging/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob the Drummer</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/14/study-says-iphone-not-great-for-txt-messaging/#comment-525112</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob the Drummer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/14/study-says-iphone-not-great-for-txt-messaging/#comment-525112</guid>
		<description>orly? srsly? kthxbye.

yeah, i just call people on the phone rather than text now.

Remember that whiskey comment from the WTF comment? It is taking effect. More not-so-funny snark to come.

You did ask for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>orly? srsly? kthxbye.</p>
<p>yeah, i just call people on the phone rather than text now.</p>
<p>Remember that whiskey comment from the WTF comment? It is taking effect. More not-so-funny snark to come.</p>
<p>You did ask for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/14/study-says-iphone-not-great-for-txt-messaging/#comment-525043</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/14/study-says-iphone-not-great-for-txt-messaging/#comment-525043</guid>
		<description>Dang, now I hate my iPhone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang, now I hate my iPhone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sport</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/14/study-says-iphone-not-great-for-txt-messaging/#comment-525037</link>
		<dc:creator>sport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/14/study-says-iphone-not-great-for-txt-messaging/#comment-525037</guid>
		<description>My response is who cares?  Since mobile devices are used for quick, shortcut type imprecise communications anyway, what difference does these small error rates make anyway - not that Apple couldn't fix some of texting problems with copy/cut and paste and keyboard standardization across iphone aps. But what companies and how many are checking error rates of their crack-berry road warriors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My response is who cares?  Since mobile devices are used for quick, shortcut type imprecise communications anyway, what difference does these small error rates make anyway - not that Apple couldn&#8217;t fix some of texting problems with copy/cut and paste and keyboard standardization across iphone aps. But what companies and how many are checking error rates of their crack-berry road warriors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.077 seconds -->
