<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slacker Portable: Better late than never?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/15/look-who-decided-to-show-up-slacker-portable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/15/look-who-decided-to-show-up-slacker-portable/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dale May</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/15/look-who-decided-to-show-up-slacker-portable/#comment-582062</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 20:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/15/look-who-decided-to-show-up-slacker-portable/#comment-582062</guid>
		<description>At first I was real excited about this player, then it got delayed.  I still waited, and now that it is shipping I don't want it anymore, I got a different player for christmas...  
d_may</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first I was real excited about this player, then it got delayed.  I still waited, and now that it is shipping I don&#8217;t want it anymore, I got a different player for christmas&#8230;<br />
d_may</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achmed</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/15/look-who-decided-to-show-up-slacker-portable/#comment-526335</link>
		<dc:creator>Achmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/15/look-who-decided-to-show-up-slacker-portable/#comment-526335</guid>
		<description>And if you are in an area w/o 'open' (aka; hijackable) Wifi, you seem to be out of luck.  I thought that this device was going to have an FM subcarrier receiver for data reception (ala vcast) as well as a satellite receiver (for the same purpose).

You CAN develop your own single-artist playlists; just sit at the web/desktop player all day an continually ban artists/songs.  Eventually (weeks), you will get a decent playlist for a particular artist.

Killer options that may or may not be included:
  Like a song?  Click on the screen and purchase the album from an online reseller.
  View average ban/love stats, just to see how 'cool' your own music
  selection is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if you are in an area w/o &#8216;open&#8217; (aka; hijackable) Wifi, you seem to be out of luck.  I thought that this device was going to have an FM subcarrier receiver for data reception (ala vcast) as well as a satellite receiver (for the same purpose).</p>
<p>You CAN develop your own single-artist playlists; just sit at the web/desktop player all day an continually ban artists/songs.  Eventually (weeks), you will get a decent playlist for a particular artist.</p>
<p>Killer options that may or may not be included:<br />
  Like a song?  Click on the screen and purchase the album from an online reseller.<br />
  View average ban/love stats, just to see how &#8216;cool&#8217; your own music<br />
  selection is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Aamoth</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/15/look-who-decided-to-show-up-slacker-portable/#comment-525598</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Aamoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/15/look-who-decided-to-show-up-slacker-portable/#comment-525598</guid>
		<description>Yes, thank you. That's worded incorrectly. It seems weird to spend at least $200 to be able to walk around with a hardware device that does the same thing and then another $90 per year to be able to save songs to it and skip over songs I don't like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, thank you. That&#8217;s worded incorrectly. It seems weird to spend at least $200 to be able to walk around with a hardware device that does the same thing and then another $90 per year to be able to save songs to it and skip over songs I don&#8217;t like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crunch Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/15/look-who-decided-to-show-up-slacker-portable/#comment-525512</link>
		<dc:creator>Crunch Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 19:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/15/look-who-decided-to-show-up-slacker-portable/#comment-525512</guid>
		<description>It isn't "$200 plus $90 per year ... (for) the same thing", it's $200 "to be able to walk around with a hardware device that does the same thing". The $90/yr is for their new infinite-skip/save-a-song service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn&#8217;t &#8220;$200 plus $90 per year &#8230; (for) the same thing&#8221;, it&#8217;s $200 &#8220;to be able to walk around with a hardware device that does the same thing&#8221;. The $90/yr is for their new infinite-skip/save-a-song service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/15/look-who-decided-to-show-up-slacker-portable/#comment-525409</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/15/look-who-decided-to-show-up-slacker-portable/#comment-525409</guid>
		<description>What happened to the 120 gig model that was supposed to come out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to the 120 gig model that was supposed to come out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.083 seconds -->
