<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3: the good, the bad, and the memory usage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/20/firefox-3-the-good-the-bad-and-the-memory-usage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/20/firefox-3-the-good-the-bad-and-the-memory-usage/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shane Reich</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/20/firefox-3-the-good-the-bad-and-the-memory-usage/#comment-660991</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Reich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/20/firefox-3-the-good-the-bad-and-the-memory-usage/#comment-660991</guid>
		<description>https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/downloads/file/23826/nightly_tester_tools-1.3-fx+tb+sb+sm.xpi

the above link is an add on for the new Firefox that can sometimes update old extensions compatible with the new Firefox.

or go to

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/

and search for "Nightly Tester"

there should be a lite version and a normal version. I chose the Normal because the Lite was not compatible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/downloads/file/23826/nightly_tester_tools-1.3-fx+tb+sb+sm.xpi" rel="nofollow">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/downloads/file/23826/nightly_tester_tools-1.3-fx+tb+sb+sm.xpi</a></p>
<p>the above link is an add on for the new Firefox that can sometimes update old extensions compatible with the new Firefox.</p>
<p>or go to</p>
<p><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/" rel="nofollow">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/</a></p>
<p>and search for &#8220;Nightly Tester&#8221;</p>
<p>there should be a lite version and a normal version. I chose the Normal because the Lite was not compatible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yuku</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/20/firefox-3-the-good-the-bad-and-the-memory-usage/#comment-529004</link>
		<dc:creator>yuku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 04:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/20/firefox-3-the-good-the-bad-and-the-memory-usage/#comment-529004</guid>
		<description>I have done a comparison of memory usage of 
Firefox 2, Firefox 3, Opera 9, and IE 7.
The result is that Firefox 3 still uses more memory than Firefox 2.
IE 7 is just a memory hog.
Read the test here: http://www.kejut.com/browsermemory</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have done a comparison of memory usage of<br />
Firefox 2, Firefox 3, Opera 9, and IE 7.<br />
The result is that Firefox 3 still uses more memory than Firefox 2.<br />
IE 7 is just a memory hog.<br />
Read the test here: <a href="http://www.kejut.com/browsermemory" rel="nofollow">http://www.kejut.com/browsermemory</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.047 seconds -->
