Comments on: Another ‘Windows XP is better than Windows Vista’ post http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/27/another-windows-xp-is-better-than-windows-vista-post/ Gadgets, gear and computer hardware. Sat, 05 Dec 2009 03:14:16 -0500 hourly 1 By: Korey Brown http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/27/another-windows-xp-is-better-than-windows-vista-post/comment-page-1/#comment-1006388 Korey Brown Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:14:29 +0000 http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/27/another-windows-xp-is-better-than-windows-vista-post/#comment-1006388 wow, you should not be posting on forums, awful arguement wow, you should not be posting on forums, awful arguement

]]> By: Taranjit http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/27/another-windows-xp-is-better-than-windows-vista-post/comment-page-1/#comment-977079 Taranjit Mon, 02 Feb 2009 04:15:44 +0000 http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/27/another-windows-xp-is-better-than-windows-vista-post/#comment-977079 WIndows vista sucks man honestly. An xp AMD Anthlon vs a vista dell 2.00GHz duo core processor and the Amd won man Xp did it in 35 Minutes while vista did it with 1 Hour. WIndows vista sucks man honestly. An xp AMD Anthlon vs a vista dell 2.00GHz duo core processor and the Amd won man Xp did it in 35 Minutes while vista did it with 1 Hour.

]]> By: Pablo http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/27/another-windows-xp-is-better-than-windows-vista-post/comment-page-1/#comment-955649 Pablo Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:11:28 +0000 http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/27/another-windows-xp-is-better-than-windows-vista-post/#comment-955649 Windows XP is so much better because the minimun to run is 256MB ram and with 1 GB it whoops some ass!, you have over 512MB or more for programs, system resources, and much more. However, Vista is so slow and crappy with windows aero if you dont have at least 2gb ram. You need your computer to be fast and reliable right? and you also want your hardware to play nicely with your software without freezing up everytime?. Windows XP SP3 will always win the battle over Vista. Windows XP is so much better because the minimun to run is 256MB ram and with 1 GB it whoops some ass!, you have over 512MB or more for programs, system resources, and much more. However, Vista is so slow and crappy with windows aero if you dont have at least 2gb ram. You need your computer to be fast and reliable right? and you also want your hardware to play nicely with your software without freezing up everytime?.

Windows XP SP3 will always win the battle over Vista.

]]> By: Wolfaaron http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/27/another-windows-xp-is-better-than-windows-vista-post/comment-page-1/#comment-772789 Wolfaaron Sun, 20 Jul 2008 02:01:50 +0000 http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/27/another-windows-xp-is-better-than-windows-vista-post/#comment-772789 Actually I run a Vista system, I update my computer the second updates are available, I compared my Vista computer with the rest of my friend's Xp, my computer was the fastest of them all. The only bad thing about vista is the compatibility with some software, but you can easily download a new version of the software and done =D Actually I run a Vista system,
I update my computer the second updates are available,
I compared my Vista computer with the rest of my friend’s Xp,
my computer was the fastest of them all.
The only bad thing about vista is the compatibility with some software, but you can easily download a new version of the software and done =D

]]> By: J. http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/27/another-windows-xp-is-better-than-windows-vista-post/comment-page-1/#comment-532163 J. Sat, 01 Dec 2007 12:06:26 +0000 http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/11/27/another-windows-xp-is-better-than-windows-vista-post/#comment-532163 I have Vista on one hard drive and XP on another hard drive Iv been switching back and forth between operating systems. Let me put it this way XP just works. Vista just does not work no matter what you do with it its feels like garbage it sure dosent game good at all it also like to crash and do strange things. XP just works its way more effecient and well programmed. Im running all new modren hardware so thats not the issue. Vista fails when it comes to resources 700MB RAM at the desktop! Thats just one example that they should have pulled the plug on this puppy!!! On the other hand XP gets by with 300MB at the desktop and it works well with all programs and applications and its fast. There is no reason to get vista besides its all buggy and messed up and slow. Look at it this way lets pretend XP and Vista looked the same. Ok you would choose the one that works best it seems people like vista for its looks. Because after all it only has its looks. I remember getting XP when it was new it just worked right out of the box. Vista out the box no way... it kinda reminds me of Windows ME. There is no Service Pack cure for Vista only way to fix it is to start over. I have Vista on one hard drive and XP on another hard drive Iv been switching back and forth between operating systems. Let me put it this way XP just works. Vista just does not work no matter what you do with it its feels like garbage it sure dosent game good at all it also like to crash and do strange things. XP just works its way more effecient and well programmed. Im running all new modren hardware so thats not the issue. Vista fails when it comes to resources 700MB RAM at the desktop! Thats just one example that they should have pulled the plug on this puppy!!! On the other hand XP gets by with 300MB at the desktop and it works well with all programs and applications and its fast. There is no reason to get vista besides its all buggy and messed up and slow. Look at it this way lets pretend XP and Vista looked the same. Ok you would choose the one that works best it seems people like vista for its looks. Because after all it only has its looks. I remember getting XP when it was new it just worked right out of the box. Vista out the box no way… it kinda reminds me of Windows ME. There is no Service Pack cure for Vista only way to fix it is to start over.

]]>