Look, a chart! A chart with numbers on it!
There’s a division of Microsoft known as the "Trustworthy Computing Group". That sounds nice. The head of the aforementioned group is Jeff Jones. He says that Internet Explorer has historically needed fewer security fixes than the competition and, as such, IE is the more secure browser.
Jones says that Mozilla has had to fix almost 200 Firefox vulnerabilities since 2004 whereas Microsoft has only needed to fix 87 Internet Explorer problems. He also points out that Microsoft still supports IE 5 while Mozilla only supports Firefox 2 and up.
Couple things to consider here. Firefox has historically been a much more customizable, extendable browser than Internet Explorer. More features invite more possible problems along the way. Also, Firefox seems to get updated more than IE and the changes seem to be more drastic. Internet Explorer hadn’t changed much until IE7 so there wouldn’t have been as many holes to plug between versions four, five, and six.
It’s kind of like comparing landline telephone service to cell phones and saying that landlines are more reliable. Sure they are, but you can’t really do much with them except talk. Cell phones let you leave the house, listen to music, look up information, and all that good stuff. It’s a trade off. Plus, landlines have been around a lot longer than cell phones so there’s been more time to work out the kinks.
Microsoft says Internet Explorer more secure than Firefox [heise Security]
It isn’t that MS only NEEDED to fix 87 vulnerabilities that is key here. It is that MS has only told us about 87. How many fixes were silently rolled into service packs? Nobody knows.
I’ll tell you something else. Nobody truly knows what MS isn’t fixing or rolling silently into service packs and Windows updates because the source is closed. The true nature of the patches is closed. Everything about the system is closed. I don’t for one second believe that MS has only fixed 87 vulnerabilities in IE. They may have only been caught 87 times but that is different.
Mozilla source is open. Mozilla takes a proactive stance on fixing vulnerabilities. MS doesn’t.
Funny how when someone find problems about Firefox everyone finds “good” reasons for it.
Firefox is slow to load: “Because it has more powerfull features”
Firefox is a memory hog: “Because ram is cheap”
Either way, I’m on the Safari. Tastes better. Looks nicer. But no plugin. Sad.
Firefox is way better than IE. Stop condemning others MS