<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IE more secure than Firefox (according to MS)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/12/04/ie-more-secure-than-firefox-according-to-ms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/12/04/ie-more-secure-than-firefox-according-to-ms/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: edwin masripan</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/12/04/ie-more-secure-than-firefox-according-to-ms/#comment-533157</link>
		<dc:creator>edwin masripan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/12/04/ie-more-secure-than-firefox-according-to-ms/#comment-533157</guid>
		<description>Either way, I'm on the Safari. Tastes better. Looks nicer. But no plugin. Sad.

Firefox is way better than IE. Stop condemning others MS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either way, I&#8217;m on the Safari. Tastes better. Looks nicer. But no plugin. Sad.</p>
<p>Firefox is way better than IE. Stop condemning others MS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yannick Desjardins</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/12/04/ie-more-secure-than-firefox-according-to-ms/#comment-533143</link>
		<dc:creator>Yannick Desjardins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/12/04/ie-more-secure-than-firefox-according-to-ms/#comment-533143</guid>
		<description>Funny how when someone find problems about Firefox everyone finds "good" reasons for it. 

Firefox is slow to load: "Because it has more powerfull features"
Firefox is a memory hog: "Because ram is cheap"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny how when someone find problems about Firefox everyone finds &#8220;good&#8221; reasons for it. </p>
<p>Firefox is slow to load: &#8220;Because it has more powerfull features&#8221;<br />
Firefox is a memory hog: &#8220;Because ram is cheap&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dualsub2006</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/12/04/ie-more-secure-than-firefox-according-to-ms/#comment-533137</link>
		<dc:creator>dualsub2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/12/04/ie-more-secure-than-firefox-according-to-ms/#comment-533137</guid>
		<description>It isn't that MS only NEEDED to fix 87 vulnerabilities that is key here. It is that MS has only told us about 87. How many fixes were silently rolled into service packs? Nobody knows.

I'll tell you something else. Nobody truly knows what MS isn't fixing or rolling silently into service packs and Windows updates because the source is closed. The true nature of the patches is closed. Everything about the system is closed. I don't for one second believe that MS has only fixed 87 vulnerabilities in IE. They may have only been caught 87 times but that is different.

Mozilla source is open. Mozilla takes a proactive stance on fixing vulnerabilities. MS doesn't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn&#8217;t that MS only NEEDED to fix 87 vulnerabilities that is key here. It is that MS has only told us about 87. How many fixes were silently rolled into service packs? Nobody knows.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll tell you something else. Nobody truly knows what MS isn&#8217;t fixing or rolling silently into service packs and Windows updates because the source is closed. The true nature of the patches is closed. Everything about the system is closed. I don&#8217;t for one second believe that MS has only fixed 87 vulnerabilities in IE. They may have only been caught 87 times but that is different.</p>
<p>Mozilla source is open. Mozilla takes a proactive stance on fixing vulnerabilities. MS doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.168 seconds -->
