<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D60 to replace D40x, still has a booty lens mount</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/12/28/nikon-d60-to-replace-d40x-still-has-a-booty-lens-mount/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/12/28/nikon-d60-to-replace-d40x-still-has-a-booty-lens-mount/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:33:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Red97</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/12/28/nikon-d60-to-replace-d40x-still-has-a-booty-lens-mount/comment-page-1/#comment-1118007</link>
		<dc:creator>Red97</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/12/28/nikon-d60-to-replace-d40x-still-has-a-booty-lens-mount/#comment-1118007</guid>
		<description>Larry Hodges, the computer scientist on the team, thinks that audio quality is, in several of their applications and exper- iments, consistently more important than visual quality. ,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry Hodges, the computer scientist on the team, thinks that audio quality is, in several of their applications and exper- iments, consistently more important than visual quality. ,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Chin</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/12/28/nikon-d60-to-replace-d40x-still-has-a-booty-lens-mount/comment-page-1/#comment-605711</link>
		<dc:creator>David Chin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/12/28/nikon-d60-to-replace-d40x-still-has-a-booty-lens-mount/#comment-605711</guid>
		<description>D60 owners who&#039;ll be taking lots of indoor photos with flash might want to consider purchasing the SB-400 external flash. Some samples to illustrate why at http://nikond60.dpnotes.com/nikon-d60-sb-400-flash/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D60 owners who&#8217;ll be taking lots of indoor photos with flash might want to consider purchasing the SB-400 external flash. Some samples to illustrate why at <a href="http://nikond60.dpnotes.com/nikon-d60-sb-400-flash/" rel="nofollow">http://nikond60.dpnotes.com/nikon-d60-sb-400-flash/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackson Wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/12/28/nikon-d60-to-replace-d40x-still-has-a-booty-lens-mount/comment-page-1/#comment-551025</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackson Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/12/28/nikon-d60-to-replace-d40x-still-has-a-booty-lens-mount/#comment-551025</guid>
		<description>I agree with the previous poster about he D40x size. Nikon must be on crack to make it&#039;s lightest, most portable dSLR its cheapest, even with some of the caveats it does. Mind you, its still way better than any prosumer digital. I&#039;ve got great shots out of this camera, but the AF has gone downhill a bit, and it would be nice to use the bigger range of lenses. The lack of stock LCD protector is also baffling. I can understand not wanting to make their bottom line camera competitive with their top model, which it is not any longer, but who wants to drop 5k on a camera every 2 years. The whole thing is asinine, when you consider medium format still wipes the floor with all but the top digitals. The fact that I have to buy a $500 70-300mm instead of a $200 70-300mm cuz the AF wont work is sort of stupid, too. Anyway, I like the D40x and love its size, and dont want to lug around a D300, sorry. Then again, I would like the lack of chromatic aberration in the D300s. Space is at a premium when travelling, and the D40x is so easy to wave around. I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if Nikon ends up with the bigger clunkier bodies at the low end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the previous poster about he D40x size. Nikon must be on crack to make it&#8217;s lightest, most portable dSLR its cheapest, even with some of the caveats it does. Mind you, its still way better than any prosumer digital. I&#8217;ve got great shots out of this camera, but the AF has gone downhill a bit, and it would be nice to use the bigger range of lenses. The lack of stock LCD protector is also baffling. I can understand not wanting to make their bottom line camera competitive with their top model, which it is not any longer, but who wants to drop 5k on a camera every 2 years. The whole thing is asinine, when you consider medium format still wipes the floor with all but the top digitals. The fact that I have to buy a $500 70-300mm instead of a $200 70-300mm cuz the AF wont work is sort of stupid, too. Anyway, I like the D40x and love its size, and dont want to lug around a D300, sorry. Then again, I would like the lack of chromatic aberration in the D300s. Space is at a premium when travelling, and the D40x is so easy to wave around. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if Nikon ends up with the bigger clunkier bodies at the low end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/12/28/nikon-d60-to-replace-d40x-still-has-a-booty-lens-mount/comment-page-1/#comment-549616</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 07:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/12/28/nikon-d60-to-replace-d40x-still-has-a-booty-lens-mount/#comment-549616</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve already spent 4 times as much on two lens (both with AF built-in) than I did on the body. To me, the body doesn&#039;t matter too much. When I hit the point where I happen to need an old Nikkor prime lens, I&#039;ll get a second body which can AF it. The D40 will always be an interesting option, however, because it is so small and lightweight.  I love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve already spent 4 times as much on two lens (both with AF built-in) than I did on the body. To me, the body doesn&#8217;t matter too much. When I hit the point where I happen to need an old Nikkor prime lens, I&#8217;ll get a second body which can AF it. The D40 will always be an interesting option, however, because it is so small and lightweight.  I love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maciej Miasik</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/12/28/nikon-d60-to-replace-d40x-still-has-a-booty-lens-mount/comment-page-1/#comment-549440</link>
		<dc:creator>Maciej Miasik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/12/28/nikon-d60-to-replace-d40x-still-has-a-booty-lens-mount/#comment-549440</guid>
		<description>D40/D40 is compatible with the following lenses:

http://www.nikonians.org/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?az=read_count&amp;om=16715&amp;forum=DCForumID201

It&#039;s more than enough for amateur user who is likely to buy this camera. D40 probably offers now the best quality/features to price ratio and the lack of focusing motor doesn&#039;t affect its usefulness for majority of users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D40/D40 is compatible with the following lenses:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nikonians.org/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?az=read_count&amp;om=16715&amp;forum=DCForumID201" rel="nofollow">http://www.nikonians.org/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?az=read_count&amp;om=16715&amp;forum=DCForumID201</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s more than enough for amateur user who is likely to buy this camera. D40 probably offers now the best quality/features to price ratio and the lack of focusing motor doesn&#8217;t affect its usefulness for majority of users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Cordell</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/12/28/nikon-d60-to-replace-d40x-still-has-a-booty-lens-mount/comment-page-1/#comment-549371</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Cordell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 20:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/12/28/nikon-d60-to-replace-d40x-still-has-a-booty-lens-mount/#comment-549371</guid>
		<description>As a D40 owner I just have to say...The D40 is a beginner Digital SLR so one can assume that most of these people don&#039;t have any lenses and can just buy the more current lenses which have autofocus built in.  A professional who has a ton of lenses isn&#039;t going to buy this camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a D40 owner I just have to say&#8230;The D40 is a beginner Digital SLR so one can assume that most of these people don&#8217;t have any lenses and can just buy the more current lenses which have autofocus built in.  A professional who has a ton of lenses isn&#8217;t going to buy this camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
