<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Office 2008 for OS X: Looks good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/02/microsoft-office-2008-for-os-x-looks-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/02/microsoft-office-2008-for-os-x-looks-good/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:42:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jameson</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/02/microsoft-office-2008-for-os-x-looks-good/comment-page-1/#comment-552486</link>
		<dc:creator>Jameson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/02/microsoft-office-2008-for-os-x-looks-good/#comment-552486</guid>
		<description>I like Pages for pretty things like resumes and portfolios. Word is better for reports. Numbers also has some really nifty conditional formatting that Excel doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Pages for pretty things like resumes and portfolios. Word is better for reports. Numbers also has some really nifty conditional formatting that Excel doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
