<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why hasn&#8217;t the XM-Sirius merger been approved yet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/04/why-hasnt-the-xm-sirius-merger-been-approved-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/04/why-hasnt-the-xm-sirius-merger-been-approved-yet/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: czman</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/04/why-hasnt-the-xm-sirius-merger-been-approved-yet/#comment-576938</link>
		<dc:creator>czman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/04/why-hasnt-the-xm-sirius-merger-been-approved-yet/#comment-576938</guid>
		<description>Thats sort of dumb - is it so important that your music comes from a satelite?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats sort of dumb - is it so important that your music comes from a satelite?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XM GOING BANKRUPT</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/04/why-hasnt-the-xm-sirius-merger-been-approved-yet/#comment-564041</link>
		<dc:creator>XM GOING BANKRUPT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/04/why-hasnt-the-xm-sirius-merger-been-approved-yet/#comment-564041</guid>
		<description>John is absolutely right.  If you take a look at XM's balance sheet, you will see that they are running a higher and higher risk of bankruptcy with each passing quarter.  The problem stems from their very high SAC (subscriber acquisition costs) coupled with stagnating subscriber, and ultimately, revenue, growth.  Each passing quarter, the rift seems to be getting larger.  It is depleting XM of much-needed operating capital.  With the credit crunch of late, XM may find it difficult to secure financing when their piggy bank runs out, which will leave them scrambling to pay of their bills.  Sirius has had a much better growth rate for at least the past 3 quarters...whether Howard haters like it or not.  This really comes down to a management issue, not a product issue.

Based on the logic that XM is significantly at-risk for going under, which would leave Sirius all alone in the satellite radio market and not obligated to offer a-la-carte pricing to consumers, the DOJ and FCC should approve the merger to guarantee a-la-carte pricing and a robust radio entertainment platform for consumers.  There is also a chance that both companies could go under, which, assuming no other entity were to buy out either tattered company, might leave many American consumers and auto retailers with useless radios installed in their vehicles.  Additionally, failure of either or both companies could result in a loss of royalty revenue...and we all know that starving artists need to get paid.

Interestingly enough, the stock prices of XM and Sirius generally tend to move in parallel as opposed to anti-parallel (i.e. Intel &#38; AMD).  When one company reports good news, both of their stocks tend to rise.  It seems that these two companies are not engaging each other as competitors in the market.  These two companies appear (and have for a while) to be an oligopoly.  I suspect that whether or not the merger is approved, XM and Sirius will continue to collaborate in order to redefine the consumer's radio entertainment experience and safeguard their very survival in the entertainment market.

For the record, I do not use either of these companies' services as I am quite content with my MP3s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John is absolutely right.  If you take a look at XM&#8217;s balance sheet, you will see that they are running a higher and higher risk of bankruptcy with each passing quarter.  The problem stems from their very high SAC (subscriber acquisition costs) coupled with stagnating subscriber, and ultimately, revenue, growth.  Each passing quarter, the rift seems to be getting larger.  It is depleting XM of much-needed operating capital.  With the credit crunch of late, XM may find it difficult to secure financing when their piggy bank runs out, which will leave them scrambling to pay of their bills.  Sirius has had a much better growth rate for at least the past 3 quarters&#8230;whether Howard haters like it or not.  This really comes down to a management issue, not a product issue.</p>
<p>Based on the logic that XM is significantly at-risk for going under, which would leave Sirius all alone in the satellite radio market and not obligated to offer a-la-carte pricing to consumers, the DOJ and FCC should approve the merger to guarantee a-la-carte pricing and a robust radio entertainment platform for consumers.  There is also a chance that both companies could go under, which, assuming no other entity were to buy out either tattered company, might leave many American consumers and auto retailers with useless radios installed in their vehicles.  Additionally, failure of either or both companies could result in a loss of royalty revenue&#8230;and we all know that starving artists need to get paid.</p>
<p>Interestingly enough, the stock prices of XM and Sirius generally tend to move in parallel as opposed to anti-parallel (i.e. Intel &amp; AMD).  When one company reports good news, both of their stocks tend to rise.  It seems that these two companies are not engaging each other as competitors in the market.  These two companies appear (and have for a while) to be an oligopoly.  I suspect that whether or not the merger is approved, XM and Sirius will continue to collaborate in order to redefine the consumer&#8217;s radio entertainment experience and safeguard their very survival in the entertainment market.</p>
<p>For the record, I do not use either of these companies&#8217; services as I am quite content with my MP3s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howard-blows</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/04/why-hasnt-the-xm-sirius-merger-been-approved-yet/#comment-558567</link>
		<dc:creator>howard-blows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/04/why-hasnt-the-xm-sirius-merger-been-approved-yet/#comment-558567</guid>
		<description>is the previous commenter (John) completely retarded?   if anyone is going bankrupt, it's sirius due to paying Howard half a billion dollars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is the previous commenter (John) completely retarded?   if anyone is going bankrupt, it&#8217;s sirius due to paying Howard half a billion dollars</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/04/why-hasnt-the-xm-sirius-merger-been-approved-yet/#comment-556861</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/04/why-hasnt-the-xm-sirius-merger-been-approved-yet/#comment-556861</guid>
		<description>I say deny the merger, just let XM go bankrupt, and then SIRIUS will be a monopoly and then everyones happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say deny the merger, just let XM go bankrupt, and then SIRIUS will be a monopoly and then everyones happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hgfrdddrd</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/04/why-hasnt-the-xm-sirius-merger-been-approved-yet/#comment-553946</link>
		<dc:creator>Hgfrdddrd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 19:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/04/why-hasnt-the-xm-sirius-merger-been-approved-yet/#comment-553946</guid>
		<description>beeep veep</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>beeep veep</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buckwheat</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/04/why-hasnt-the-xm-sirius-merger-been-approved-yet/#comment-553918</link>
		<dc:creator>buckwheat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/04/why-hasnt-the-xm-sirius-merger-been-approved-yet/#comment-553918</guid>
		<description>yea but the i-pod doesn't broadcast on satellites does it now....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea but the i-pod doesn&#8217;t broadcast on satellites does it now&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.088 seconds -->
