<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CTIA/FCC could outlaw cellular repeaters AKA &#8220;jammers&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/18/ctiafcc-could-outlaw-cellular-repeaters-aka-jammers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/18/ctiafcc-could-outlaw-cellular-repeaters-aka-jammers/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:17:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gord</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/18/ctiafcc-could-outlaw-cellular-repeaters-aka-jammers/comment-page-1/#comment-577661</link>
		<dc:creator>Gord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 03:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/18/ctiafcc-could-outlaw-cellular-repeaters-aka-jammers/#comment-577661</guid>
		<description>FCC only cares about Wireless amplifiers / repeaters that interfere with Cellular networks . This is not all cellular amplifiers / repeaters they are going after</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FCC only cares about Wireless amplifiers / repeaters that interfere with Cellular networks . This is not all cellular amplifiers / repeaters they are going after</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
