<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Missing&#8221; non-AT&#038;T iPhones cost Apple $300+ million</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/28/missing-non-att-iphones-cost-apple-300-million/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/28/missing-non-att-iphones-cost-apple-300-million/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Original JLO</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/28/missing-non-att-iphones-cost-apple-300-million/#comment-582166</link>
		<dc:creator>Original JLO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/28/missing-non-att-iphones-cost-apple-300-million/#comment-582166</guid>
		<description>Obviously it is bad, that revenue thats gone missing is residual, long time after apples costs have been covered I presume they'd be getting a cut from AT&#38;T maybe for the life of the contract which could be indefinite. That 300 mil might be just like very thick icing on a big ol cake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously it is bad, that revenue thats gone missing is residual, long time after apples costs have been covered I presume they&#8217;d be getting a cut from AT&amp;T maybe for the life of the contract which could be indefinite. That 300 mil might be just like very thick icing on a big ol cake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Synthmeister</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/28/missing-non-att-iphones-cost-apple-300-million/#comment-578358</link>
		<dc:creator>Synthmeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/28/missing-non-att-iphones-cost-apple-300-million/#comment-578358</guid>
		<description>Hugh, Apple sells more phones and that's, ugh, bad? 

Sure, they  might miss a little revenue down the road but they also continue to ramp up the manufacturing, lower costs, grow the market for iPhone/iPod Touch applications, steal sales away from i-Phone knock-offs and give prospective markets a tantalizing preview of their products.

Oh yea, the graph, what can I say? Did you do that on a Gateway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugh, Apple sells more phones and that&#8217;s, ugh, bad? </p>
<p>Sure, they  might miss a little revenue down the road but they also continue to ramp up the manufacturing, lower costs, grow the market for iPhone/iPod Touch applications, steal sales away from i-Phone knock-offs and give prospective markets a tantalizing preview of their products.</p>
<p>Oh yea, the graph, what can I say? Did you do that on a Gateway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.040 seconds -->
