<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung, Moto pull ahead of HTC in Windows Mobile market share</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/29/samsung-moto-pull-ahead-of-htc-in-windows-mobile-market-share/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/29/samsung-moto-pull-ahead-of-htc-in-windows-mobile-market-share/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:52:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/29/samsung-moto-pull-ahead-of-htc-in-windows-mobile-market-share/comment-page-1/#comment-835077</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/29/samsung-moto-pull-ahead-of-htc-in-windows-mobile-market-share/#comment-835077</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Most people now look at three segments

High end - Smartphone (includes iphone thru PDA)

Mid - Feature phone, ie typical Sony Ericsson, Samsung

Low end - Low end, e.g. Nokia 1100 for emerging markets

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Most people now look at three segments</p>
<p>High end &#8211; Smartphone (includes iphone thru PDA)</p>
<p>Mid &#8211; Feature phone, ie typical Sony Ericsson, Samsung</p>
<p>Low end &#8211; Low end, e.g. Nokia 1100 for emerging markets</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/29/samsung-moto-pull-ahead-of-htc-in-windows-mobile-market-share/comment-page-1/#comment-807931</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 23:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/01/29/samsung-moto-pull-ahead-of-htc-in-windows-mobile-market-share/#comment-807931</guid>
		<description>Can you please explain to me what the difference is between a smartphone and a PDA phone?  This IS confusing.  And I think what you wrote confuses me still...

From what I understand, you have 4 different phone types you are talking about here:

Smartphones:
&gt; Non-touchscreen (HTC was on top, now #3 with  Touchscreen

PDA phones (HTC has 50% market share):
&gt; Non-touchscreen
&gt; Touchscreen

So, besides the differences between smart and PDA phones, what is HTC&#039;s share of the touchscreen smartphone market?  And what is the breakdown of their 50% share of the PDA phone market between touchscreen and non-touchscreen phones?

Who distinguishes phone types this way?  Marketers or consumers?  It&#039;s perplexing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you please explain to me what the difference is between a smartphone and a PDA phone?  This IS confusing.  And I think what you wrote confuses me still&#8230;</p>
<p>From what I understand, you have 4 different phone types you are talking about here:</p>
<p>Smartphones:<br />
&gt; Non-touchscreen (HTC was on top, now #3 with  Touchscreen</p>
<p>PDA phones (HTC has 50% market share):<br />
&gt; Non-touchscreen<br />
&gt; Touchscreen</p>
<p>So, besides the differences between smart and PDA phones, what is HTC&#8217;s share of the touchscreen smartphone market?  And what is the breakdown of their 50% share of the PDA phone market between touchscreen and non-touchscreen phones?</p>
<p>Who distinguishes phone types this way?  Marketers or consumers?  It&#8217;s perplexing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
