The Unreasonable Stance: Vote Republican for a tech revolution

scaledpresidential_seal.jpgHere at CrunchGear, we try to stay clear of political debates; after all, our mandate is hardware, gadgets, and technological goings-on. So usually, on all the sticky social and foreign policy issues, we stay mum. But when the outcome of the race could affect the entire tech sector, I feel a responsibility to throw our weight behind some candidate or another. In this case, the choice is clear. The Republicans will advance the industry to a whole new level, and create a technological hegemony led by the industry’s biggest leaders and most ruthless corporations. The benefits are obvious and manifold.

Vote Republican and we will witness a tech revolution. Tax cuts for corporations and allowing lobbyists unrestricted access to legislators will grease the wheels of industry and soon all minor players will be crushed under the heel of the majors: Intel, Microsoft, Nvidia, Sony, and all their subsidiaries and manufacturers will run roughshod over the younger companies who have yet to own a single senator or interest group. Good god! you say. It sounds like a calamity more than a revolution! So it seems at first, but by the end of a few years, you will see why I endorsed this course of action.

As people have arrived voluntarily at a restrictive two-party system in which the main difference is in which income segment gets bigger tax breaks, and in which innovation is stifled in favor of pandering and satisfying special interests, so will we model the tech industry: monolithic companies like great nations, tentacular with arms and divisions, will meet all needs and provide the comfort of small improvements on the products you already own and know. Because the post-9/11 technological world is like the political landscape: tumultuous and unpredictable. People will appreciate a little security, and planned obsolescence will become either universal or cease to exist, depending on your perspective.

What we need now is not innovation, but standards. As the smaller companies are eliminated, the number of drivers, interfaces, and proprietary workflows will dwindle until there are only a few. No longer will you have to worry about converting your video from AVI to MPG or from composite to DVI; there will be only one cable, and there will be only one codec. And who wouldn’t want that?

In the interest of security, a state operating system will be named. After all, the cyber-terrorists will find us vulnerable in our state of division - only in unification will we find safety. Obviously, Vista will be the OS of choice, though OSX will be allowed to remain as a niche OS, though Mac users will be put on a(nother) watch list for endangering their data-neighbors. I know we don’t all agree that Vista is the best option, but when it’s the only option I’m sure you’ll find it quite useable. We might even get a discount on state-sponsored software! And America’s Army will come pre-installed on every computer.

The progressive policies of people like Barack Obama will lead to nothing but chaos. With a hundred thousand companies inventing, coding and refining, it will be impossible for the consumer to choose the best! And free, open source software will provide another confounding factor: code junkies slapping together Franken-apps ridden with borrowed structures and designed for interoperability instead of standalone functionality. The internet will descend into madness: a primordial ooze of blogs, user-generated content, and ideologically dangerous social networks. But we have a choice. With a bought candidate like Huckabee whose main interest is in satisfying his campaign contributors and establishing a unified American culture, the tech majors will be able to curb competition and dominate the market completely.

So if you favor a vast wilderness of formats, a free market of ideas, and the endless tail-eating of free and open source software’s constant self-improvement, go with TechCrunch’s recommendation of Obama or even McCain. But if you’re tired of choice, happy with the status quo (whatever they tell you it is), and don’t mind stepping on the little guy every once in a while, vote as Right as you can. You probably won’t regret it!

Unreasonable Stance is a column in which one CrunchGear writer tries to argue for the other, not usually accepted, side. Sometimes it’s satire, sometimes it’s trolling, sometimes it’s gibberish. Most importantly, however, it is an attempt to see a technical issue or product from another perspective, something we rarely do in our compartmentalized, partisan world.

  • Sphere It

10 Comments so far

 
df

what no ron paul mention?

for shame…

 
no image
John (Who am I?)

And crunchgear has now been removed from my netvibes. I really don’t feel like being insulted as a Republican.

 
no image
(Who am I?)

This has to be the absolute most frigtarded reason to vote dem I’ve ever heard. An unreasonable stance? More like an unreasoned and unbalanced stance. I’m not a fan of the current regime of Republicans in office, but there is a variety of view points being represented on both sides of the aisle. Granted, the field is starting to narrow, but if you can’t find something that represents a pro-tech viewpoint on both sides of the aisle, then you are being willfully ignorant.

 
no image
Krump (Who am I?)

Too bad you are not half as educated in politics\government as you are in tech. You bought hook line and sinker into a bunch of crap that someone sold you. If you are naive enough to believe lobbists and money are more inherent on the right that the left, you are beyond hope. I am taking crunchgear off my reads. This is highschool level stuff.

 
no image
Alex (Who am I?)

Hmmm. I was about to be impressed with the clarity of this post - until I saw the disclaimer at the end. BTW: Vote McCain.

 
no image
Honest Guy (Who am I?)

I would prefer to get a haircut from a barber, and not a lawyer. You just ruined your credibility in my book - Devin Coldewey needs a wake-up call - and all those who support this guy need to figure out their role.

 
no image
JP (Who am I?)

He said “tentacular”. Heh.

 
no image
frogflight24 (Who am I?)

haha I can’t decide if the whole article was intended to be sarcastic or not…

Diversity and competition is supposedly one of the main pillars of tech growth and innovation right?…

 
no image
drdrew (Who am I?)

Devin, an “unreasonable stance” would have been to say that among an amazing array of asshats up for election, each candidate has, in one way or another, the best interest of the tech sector in mind. Arguable, as they don’t, but still closer to the outline of this column than your incessant ramblings about your Communistic point of view of world domination; excuse me, I meant to say, “global simplification”. Oh wait, I just read sometimes it’s gibberish. You’re still a Commie. Commie!
.
Since it’s my right to do so, I’m bucking the mainstream and voting for Ralph. Like Flanders said, “We can’t all not vote, nobody does that.”

 
no image
David Mackey (Who am I?)

Hmmm…If I recall Mike Huckabee is for the Fair Tax which would eliminate the IRS and in turn reduce lobbyist’s power since they would no longer be able to create loopholes in the federal tax system.

Trackbacks/Pings

No trackbacks or pings yet.

Leave a Comment

« Back to text comment

Comment template by SezWho

CrunchGear Sponsors