JPEG XR may offer a fix for DSLR users who need a higher burst rate

microsoft-lens.jpgI’ve never had a problem with my old Rebel XT’s 3-per-second rapid fire rate. Of course, I’m not a press or sport photographer, and it is kind of annoying that I can only take like 8 RAW photos at that speed before it has to stop and think for a while. Memory bandwidth and buffer size are not the Rebel’s strong point; more expensive cameras make a point of having better hardware in this area. But what are my options? I dare not shoot to JPEG because I’m a big post-work guy and I need that color depth and dynamic range.

It looks like Microsoft is stepping up to the plate here with a format called JPEG XR (eXtended Range), which uses a better compression algorithm than normal JPEGs while retaining more of the color depth and dynamic range of RAW files. They’re going up against other compressed RAW options like DNG so it won’t be an easy fight. I’m not exactly pumped at the idea of another MS-led proprietary format, but to be honest, if it advances the technology, I’m not going to cry too hard about it.

Could JPEG XR deliver cheaper, better burst shooting? [Crave]

2 Comments/Pingbacks so far

 
no image
Johnal (Who am I?)

I’m still a tad skeptical and will probably stick to my Raw workflow, but only time will tell. Although, I could have sworn this was announced in the middle of ‘07… maybe not…i might just be confused.

 
no image
Devin Coldewey (Who am I?)

Totally… in any case I doubt it will even be an option for me to get this on my Rebel. In the meantime my RAW workflow makes for fantastic pictures and that’s what matters.

Trackbacks/Pings

Leave a Comment

« Back to text comment

Comment template by SezWho

CrunchGear Sponsors