<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proposed law would make Internet traffic interference illegal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/13/proposed-law-would-make-internet-traffic-interference-illegal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/13/proposed-law-would-make-internet-traffic-interference-illegal/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:43:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: drdrew</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/13/proposed-law-would-make-internet-traffic-interference-illegal/comment-page-1/#comment-589942</link>
		<dc:creator>drdrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/13/proposed-law-would-make-internet-traffic-interference-illegal/#comment-589942</guid>
		<description>uh-oh, the candidates have just been informed.  now i need to see who sways yes/no on prop whatever.  best elections evar. yes, best elections evar...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uh-oh, the candidates have just been informed.  now i need to see who sways yes/no on prop whatever.  best elections evar. yes, best elections evar&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/13/proposed-law-would-make-internet-traffic-interference-illegal/comment-page-1/#comment-589806</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/13/proposed-law-would-make-internet-traffic-interference-illegal/#comment-589806</guid>
		<description>AT&amp;T isn&#039;t really much better.  I spent hours trying to figure out why intermittently my ftp connection could not connect.  Well AT&amp;T was adding headers to certain packets for tracking, which fubar my connection.  Once I switched to sftp I was fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T isn&#8217;t really much better.  I spent hours trying to figure out why intermittently my ftp connection could not connect.  Well AT&amp;T was adding headers to certain packets for tracking, which fubar my connection.  Once I switched to sftp I was fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarett</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/13/proposed-law-would-make-internet-traffic-interference-illegal/comment-page-1/#comment-589798</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/13/proposed-law-would-make-internet-traffic-interference-illegal/#comment-589798</guid>
		<description>Comcast already offers an option for legitimate, unlimited high-speed internet. It&#039;s called &quot;switching to AT&amp;T.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comcast already offers an option for legitimate, unlimited high-speed internet. It&#8217;s called &#8220;switching to AT&amp;T.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/13/proposed-law-would-make-internet-traffic-interference-illegal/comment-page-1/#comment-589779</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/13/proposed-law-would-make-internet-traffic-interference-illegal/#comment-589779</guid>
		<description>I want more internets faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want more internets faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
