<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MacBooks left out in the cold, no multi-touch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/26/macbooks-left-out-in-the-cold-no-multi-touch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/26/macbooks-left-out-in-the-cold-no-multi-touch/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:07:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jj550</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/26/macbooks-left-out-in-the-cold-no-multi-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-598697</link>
		<dc:creator>jj550</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/26/macbooks-left-out-in-the-cold-no-multi-touch/#comment-598697</guid>
		<description>So is it or is it not true that multitouch is really just software?  My MacBook already has two-finger scrolling, so couldn&#039;t a software controller enable that other gimmicky, probably not all that useful, time-wasting to figure it out, multitouch goodness, too?  Or do I have to eBay it and pony up for an MBP so I can feel underwhelmed but really trendy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is it or is it not true that multitouch is really just software?  My MacBook already has two-finger scrolling, so couldn&#8217;t a software controller enable that other gimmicky, probably not all that useful, time-wasting to figure it out, multitouch goodness, too?  Or do I have to eBay it and pony up for an MBP so I can feel underwhelmed but really trendy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
