<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Benchmark: Apple 2.5GHz Penryn MacBook Pro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/28/benchmark-apple-25ghz-penryn-macbook-pro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/28/benchmark-apple-25ghz-penryn-macbook-pro/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ted in NC</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/28/benchmark-apple-25ghz-penryn-macbook-pro/#comment-641959</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted in NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 01:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/28/benchmark-apple-25ghz-penryn-macbook-pro/#comment-641959</guid>
		<description>"Without a previous gen MBP in the mix the numbers don’t mean as much, but we will be adding a 2.16GHz Core Duo MacBook Pro into the fold later on today so that should give some of you a better indication of what’s going on with the Penryn-based MacBook Pro."

I'm guessing this either never was done, or was never posted?

Ted</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Without a previous gen MBP in the mix the numbers don’t mean as much, but we will be adding a 2.16GHz Core Duo MacBook Pro into the fold later on today so that should give some of you a better indication of what’s going on with the Penryn-based MacBook Pro.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing this either never was done, or was never posted?</p>
<p>Ted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bit Boy</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/28/benchmark-apple-25ghz-penryn-macbook-pro/#comment-603372</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bit Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 01:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/28/benchmark-apple-25ghz-penryn-macbook-pro/#comment-603372</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting the numbers.  If anyone is interested in 3D mark numbers for the new Penryn machines, you can find it here...  
http://www.bitboysblog.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting the numbers.  If anyone is interested in 3D mark numbers for the new Penryn machines, you can find it here&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.bitboysblog.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bitboysblog.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Vassar</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/28/benchmark-apple-25ghz-penryn-macbook-pro/#comment-602551</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Vassar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 02:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/02/28/benchmark-apple-25ghz-penryn-macbook-pro/#comment-602551</guid>
		<description>My MBA with 1.8 GHz CPU and SSD drive got a Geekbench score of 2176 and integer score of 1872.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My MBA with 1.8 GHz CPU and SSD drive got a Geekbench score of 2176 and integer score of 1872.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.038 seconds -->
