<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Take-Two plans severance for potentially fired employees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/10/take-two-plans-severance-for-potentially-fired-employees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/10/take-two-plans-severance-for-potentially-fired-employees/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:20:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: EABlizzardvsionstar</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/10/take-two-plans-severance-for-potentially-fired-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-613011</link>
		<dc:creator>EABlizzardvsionstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/10/take-two-plans-severance-for-potentially-fired-employees/#comment-613011</guid>
		<description>This is called a &#039;poison pill&#039; used as a tactic when a company is in a hostile take over 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poison_pill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is called a &#8216;poison pill&#8217; used as a tactic when a company is in a hostile take over </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poison_pill" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poison_pill</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/10/take-two-plans-severance-for-potentially-fired-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-612314</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/10/take-two-plans-severance-for-potentially-fired-employees/#comment-612314</guid>
		<description>Though I think it&#039;d be interesting to see the merge happen...I just don&#039;t want it to.

But it&#039;s good to see Take-Two Take-Care of their Taken-Employees....I know, I&#039;m lame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though I think it&#8217;d be interesting to see the merge happen&#8230;I just don&#8217;t want it to.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s good to see Take-Two Take-Care of their Taken-Employees&#8230;.I know, I&#8217;m lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Biggs</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/10/take-two-plans-severance-for-potentially-fired-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-612281</link>
		<dc:creator>John Biggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/10/take-two-plans-severance-for-potentially-fired-employees/#comment-612281</guid>
		<description>It would be suicide for them to blow the GTA franchise. I suspect they&#039;ll keep on the key folks and let them work in piece. Only the EA lawyers will worry much about the Mature rating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be suicide for them to blow the GTA franchise. I suspect they&#8217;ll keep on the key folks and let them work in piece. Only the EA lawyers will worry much about the Mature rating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/10/take-two-plans-severance-for-potentially-fired-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-612263</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/10/take-two-plans-severance-for-potentially-fired-employees/#comment-612263</guid>
		<description>Is anyone else terrified as to what it will mean for the GTA Franchise when EA games takes it over.  EA has a terrible reputation of turning games into cheap franchises where they pump out a new one every year, and GTA isnt a game that could do well with that type of strategy.  It simply needs massive amounts of time and effort put forward.

Plus I dont see EA games as the right company for a solid Mature game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anyone else terrified as to what it will mean for the GTA Franchise when EA games takes it over.  EA has a terrible reputation of turning games into cheap franchises where they pump out a new one every year, and GTA isnt a game that could do well with that type of strategy.  It simply needs massive amounts of time and effort put forward.</p>
<p>Plus I dont see EA games as the right company for a solid Mature game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
