<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Onkyo&#8217;s entry-level 5.1 system gets reviewed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/14/onkyos-entry-level-51-system-gets-reviewed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/14/onkyos-entry-level-51-system-gets-reviewed/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 04:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/14/onkyos-entry-level-51-system-gets-reviewed/#comment-616146</link>
		<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/14/onkyos-entry-level-51-system-gets-reviewed/#comment-616146</guid>
		<description>I have an onkyo receiver, its an older one (made before the one you mentioned in the article) but I love that thing. it wasn't that expensive and it has  really nice sound, really made me a fan of Onkyo receivers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an onkyo receiver, its an older one (made before the one you mentioned in the article) but I love that thing. it wasn&#8217;t that expensive and it has  really nice sound, really made me a fan of Onkyo receivers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.073 seconds -->
