<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple: Great or super great?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/16/apple-great-or-super-great/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/16/apple-great-or-super-great/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:05:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SwissFreek</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/16/apple-great-or-super-great/comment-page-1/#comment-617192</link>
		<dc:creator>SwissFreek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/16/apple-great-or-super-great/#comment-617192</guid>
		<description>Yeah, because that worked wonders for Dell... OK, maybe it did for sales, but who looks at a Dell now and says &quot;there&#039;s a quality computer.&quot; No, they are the eMachines of the mid-2000&#039;s. Let&#039;s hope Apple doesn&#039;t follow suit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, because that worked wonders for Dell&#8230; OK, maybe it did for sales, but who looks at a Dell now and says &#8220;there&#8217;s a quality computer.&#8221; No, they are the eMachines of the mid-2000&#8217;s. Let&#8217;s hope Apple doesn&#8217;t follow suit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
