<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Onda&#8217;s VX676 looks like a Touch, but with real 16:9</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/25/ondas-vx676-looks-like-a-touch-but-with-real-169/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/25/ondas-vx676-looks-like-a-touch-but-with-real-169/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:40:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Trae Dorn</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/25/ondas-vx676-looks-like-a-touch-but-with-real-169/comment-page-1/#comment-624337</link>
		<dc:creator>Trae Dorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/25/ondas-vx676-looks-like-a-touch-but-with-real-169/#comment-624337</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually surprised there are people who would buy the Touch who *aren&#039;t* interested in the WiFi connectivity - as for the same price you can get a Classic with more memory that can still play video.

That said, I love my iPod Touch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually surprised there are people who would buy the Touch who *aren&#8217;t* interested in the WiFi connectivity &#8211; as for the same price you can get a Classic with more memory that can still play video.</p>
<p>That said, I love my iPod Touch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sikantis</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/25/ondas-vx676-looks-like-a-touch-but-with-real-169/comment-page-1/#comment-623350</link>
		<dc:creator>sikantis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/25/ondas-vx676-looks-like-a-touch-but-with-real-169/#comment-623350</guid>
		<description>Cool man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarett</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/25/ondas-vx676-looks-like-a-touch-but-with-real-169/comment-page-1/#comment-623337</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/25/ondas-vx676-looks-like-a-touch-but-with-real-169/#comment-623337</guid>
		<description>For a second, I thought that was a &quot;Brokeback Mountain&quot; image on the screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a second, I thought that was a &#8220;Brokeback Mountain&#8221; image on the screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grandpa Doodie!</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/25/ondas-vx676-looks-like-a-touch-but-with-real-169/comment-page-1/#comment-623265</link>
		<dc:creator>Grandpa Doodie!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/25/ondas-vx676-looks-like-a-touch-but-with-real-169/#comment-623265</guid>
		<description>Are these really modeled after the iPod Touch or iPhone?   Is it fair to call this a rip off?
These movie/mp3 players are, basically, all screen - with a border.  How revolutionary is that design?  iPods - that circle interface - thats revolution.  
Touch screens aren&#039;t even ground breaking - iPhones just do it the best!  Oh yeah, and they take all the glory too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are these really modeled after the iPod Touch or iPhone?   Is it fair to call this a rip off?<br />
These movie/mp3 players are, basically, all screen &#8211; with a border.  How revolutionary is that design?  iPods &#8211; that circle interface &#8211; thats revolution.<br />
Touch screens aren&#8217;t even ground breaking &#8211; iPhones just do it the best!  Oh yeah, and they take all the glory too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
