<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Unreasonable Stance: All About Linux 2008 edition: Linux sucks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:35:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: uPUNTu</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-978578</link>
		<dc:creator>uPUNTu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/#comment-978578</guid>
		<description>Finally, someone had the nerve to say it out loud. Linux is not an OS, it&#039;s developer porn. Only meant for people who have nothing better to do than de-bug something that is supposed to actually work when installed. Sure, convert your business over to Linux but first plan for the huge losses in productivity due to down time and don&#039;t forget to HIRE several Linux &quot;techs&quot; to try and make it function. 
I wish it did work but it doesn&#039;t. Not only doesn&#039;t it work but it will royally screw up your legacy system should you make the grand mistake of believing the BS hype and trying to install it. (Talking to real people here, not those of you with no lives who are happy to spend several hundred hours fixing it)

This crapware is free for a reason. 
Linux is amateur hour - period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, someone had the nerve to say it out loud. Linux is not an OS, it&#8217;s developer porn. Only meant for people who have nothing better to do than de-bug something that is supposed to actually work when installed. Sure, convert your business over to Linux but first plan for the huge losses in productivity due to down time and don&#8217;t forget to HIRE several Linux &#8220;techs&#8221; to try and make it function.<br />
I wish it did work but it doesn&#8217;t. Not only doesn&#8217;t it work but it will royally screw up your legacy system should you make the grand mistake of believing the BS hype and trying to install it. (Talking to real people here, not those of you with no lives who are happy to spend several hundred hours fixing it)</p>
<p>This crapware is free for a reason.<br />
Linux is amateur hour &#8211; period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Borax Man</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-972063</link>
		<dc:creator>Borax Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/#comment-972063</guid>
		<description>apt-get sucks.

You STILL just can download an program and run/install it. I&#039;ve got another Ubuntu machine, do I have to redownload the same program?  Can I copy the downloaded file to that machine and install?

My friend is running Fedora.  Can I e-mail him the program I downloaded?  They&#039;re both Linux, right? Nope, wont work.  Whats worse, he Fedora might only be a mere 2 years old and can&#039;t run new software.

Linux users insult Windows users for having an OS automatically do everything, yet this is precisely what apt-get does, automatically make any changes to libraries, and other software, to get an app to work.  Even if it breaks other apps.  Of course, Linux users assume that you have broadband, or SHOULD have it.  Or that you have internet access at all.

Can you just buy a PC magazine and install the program provided on the CD?  Nope.  Windows you can.  Mac you can.  Linux nope.  You just gotta hope some other geek has done the work in making a package for your distro and its in a repository that you&#039;ve configured and that its up to date.  If you&#039;re distro doesn&#039;t have repositories, or smaller ones, there is a good chance youre screwed.

I can still run DOS programs on XP, and I can download a GUI to 7zip and have it run in Win98.  I run a later Linux distro (RH 7.3), but there is no GUI for p7zip which will work, simply because some developer likes to play with widgets and for some reason, despite the fact that this program is nothing more than a filebrowser, some buttons and option boxes and a front end to a CLI program I already have, it can&#039;t work for some asinine reason.

Windows doesn&#039;t do this, which is why its better for software developers and users.  MY users wont miss out on running a simple &quot;Hello, world&quot; program because someone thought that their &quot;OK&quot; button should be themable using a scripting language or whatever it is they&#039;ve done and that those with GUI&#039;s that aren&#039;t themable should lose this ability.

Linux only allows you to do more than windows because of the CLI an THATS IT.  In every other way its backwards.  It doesn&#039;t allow you to just be able to write a program that others can use universally.  It doesn&#039;t allow you to run newer programs if you&#039;re OS is &quot;outdated&quot; without upgrading.  Much of the software out there won&#039;t run because it wont compile, or the obscure libraries it depends on aren&#039;t availabe, or wont compile, or the version of GCC or autoconf or automake is not the right one.

I went to Linux because I believed that it a) really let you use your computer and b) helped you learn about it (not that I didn&#039;t know anything, having coded in assembly in DOS, built my own PC&#039;s etc) but in reality it
a) Has a good command line and nifty system administration features, but many things which SHOULD work, just dont
and
b) doesn&#039;t really teach you about your computer, but only bout the innards of software packages and how to go about fixing broken things which should be working.  Trying to get source code to compile, or a broken source RPM to recompile teaches me NOTHING useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apt-get sucks.</p>
<p>You STILL just can download an program and run/install it. I&#8217;ve got another Ubuntu machine, do I have to redownload the same program?  Can I copy the downloaded file to that machine and install?</p>
<p>My friend is running Fedora.  Can I e-mail him the program I downloaded?  They&#8217;re both Linux, right? Nope, wont work.  Whats worse, he Fedora might only be a mere 2 years old and can&#8217;t run new software.</p>
<p>Linux users insult Windows users for having an OS automatically do everything, yet this is precisely what apt-get does, automatically make any changes to libraries, and other software, to get an app to work.  Even if it breaks other apps.  Of course, Linux users assume that you have broadband, or SHOULD have it.  Or that you have internet access at all.</p>
<p>Can you just buy a PC magazine and install the program provided on the CD?  Nope.  Windows you can.  Mac you can.  Linux nope.  You just gotta hope some other geek has done the work in making a package for your distro and its in a repository that you&#8217;ve configured and that its up to date.  If you&#8217;re distro doesn&#8217;t have repositories, or smaller ones, there is a good chance youre screwed.</p>
<p>I can still run DOS programs on XP, and I can download a GUI to 7zip and have it run in Win98.  I run a later Linux distro (RH 7.3), but there is no GUI for p7zip which will work, simply because some developer likes to play with widgets and for some reason, despite the fact that this program is nothing more than a filebrowser, some buttons and option boxes and a front end to a CLI program I already have, it can&#8217;t work for some asinine reason.</p>
<p>Windows doesn&#8217;t do this, which is why its better for software developers and users.  MY users wont miss out on running a simple &#8220;Hello, world&#8221; program because someone thought that their &#8220;OK&#8221; button should be themable using a scripting language or whatever it is they&#8217;ve done and that those with GUI&#8217;s that aren&#8217;t themable should lose this ability.</p>
<p>Linux only allows you to do more than windows because of the CLI an THATS IT.  In every other way its backwards.  It doesn&#8217;t allow you to just be able to write a program that others can use universally.  It doesn&#8217;t allow you to run newer programs if you&#8217;re OS is &#8220;outdated&#8221; without upgrading.  Much of the software out there won&#8217;t run because it wont compile, or the obscure libraries it depends on aren&#8217;t availabe, or wont compile, or the version of GCC or autoconf or automake is not the right one.</p>
<p>I went to Linux because I believed that it a) really let you use your computer and b) helped you learn about it (not that I didn&#8217;t know anything, having coded in assembly in DOS, built my own PC&#8217;s etc) but in reality it<br />
a) Has a good command line and nifty system administration features, but many things which SHOULD work, just dont<br />
and<br />
b) doesn&#8217;t really teach you about your computer, but only bout the innards of software packages and how to go about fixing broken things which should be working.  Trying to get source code to compile, or a broken source RPM to recompile teaches me NOTHING useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unix Guru</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-969871</link>
		<dc:creator>Unix Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/#comment-969871</guid>
		<description>I agree 100% with everthing in this article.  Would you buy a car that was cobbled together from parts made by unknown sources?  If so, when it broke down, who would you depend on to fix it?  Can you imagine all the finger pointing?

Open source software is fine as long as it works.  When it breaks, nobody wants to take ownership and fix it in a timely manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100% with everthing in this article.  Would you buy a car that was cobbled together from parts made by unknown sources?  If so, when it broke down, who would you depend on to fix it?  Can you imagine all the finger pointing?</p>
<p>Open source software is fine as long as it works.  When it breaks, nobody wants to take ownership and fix it in a timely manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pj_harvey</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-945823</link>
		<dc:creator>pj_harvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/#comment-945823</guid>
		<description>Unfunny people shouldn&#039;t try to write funny articles.

If someone in your circle friends convinced you that you&#039;re funny, you should make him/her your Worst Enemy. You&#039;ve been duped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfunny people shouldn&#8217;t try to write funny articles.</p>
<p>If someone in your circle friends convinced you that you&#8217;re funny, you should make him/her your Worst Enemy. You&#8217;ve been duped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yourmom</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-939411</link>
		<dc:creator>Yourmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 02:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/#comment-939411</guid>
		<description>0_o... you&#039;re fucking stupid... You were probably looking in the wrong place. Searching for the jargon. All you have to do is mount the second drive and you can do all the copying, moving, and super linking that you&#039;d like... Linux isn&#039;t automated, it doesn&#039;t do everything for you like stupid friendly windows does. Look up a tutorial on command line, or perhaps how to make things automated for your simple mind. Good day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>0_o&#8230; you&#8217;re fucking stupid&#8230; You were probably looking in the wrong place. Searching for the jargon. All you have to do is mount the second drive and you can do all the copying, moving, and super linking that you&#8217;d like&#8230; Linux isn&#8217;t automated, it doesn&#8217;t do everything for you like stupid friendly windows does. Look up a tutorial on command line, or perhaps how to make things automated for your simple mind. Good day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LinuxSucks</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-939360</link>
		<dc:creator>LinuxSucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/#comment-939360</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used OpenSUSE and I couldn&#039;t copy and paste items from one drive to another, the option simply does not show up. If that&#039;s not bad enough, looking for the answer online took hours, and still THERE WAS NO FIX. That was just one issue out of many. Long story short, I switched back to Windows yesterday and will never look back. Fuck you Linux</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used OpenSUSE and I couldn&#8217;t copy and paste items from one drive to another, the option simply does not show up. If that&#8217;s not bad enough, looking for the answer online took hours, and still THERE WAS NO FIX. That was just one issue out of many. Long story short, I switched back to Windows yesterday and will never look back. Fuck you Linux</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WiseGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-667992</link>
		<dc:creator>WiseGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/#comment-667992</guid>
		<description>Corrected:

The average layman wants a system that works out of the box not an OS where you have issues every 5 minutes

* At work we have OpenSuse anw use openoffice on it 99% of the time *</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corrected:</p>
<p>The average layman wants a system that works out of the box not an OS where you have issues every 5 minutes</p>
<p>* At work we have OpenSuse anw use openoffice on it 99% of the time *</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WiseGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-667987</link>
		<dc:creator>WiseGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/#comment-667987</guid>
		<description>First of all forgive my english, but it&#039;s not my mother language
Now my 2 cents on the matter:
Linux, in my opinion, as of may 2008 is not yet a OS worth looking at for the desktop.
Let&#039;s face it: linux is for geeks, the average layman does not want to spend hours scouring forums for solutions and writing tens of lines of apt-get, sudo, chmod, dpkg, modprobe etc, hoping this will solve the problem 

The average layman wants a system that works out of the box not an OS where

I am not a computer illiterate, i&#039;ve been using computers since i bought a sinclair spectrum in 1983, then i bought a C128 , two amigas, an apple and since 1995 have been using PCs everyday, i switch back and forth from linux at work to windows at home, yet today i wanted to try Kubuntu 8.04 64bit on my older pc (AMD64 4200 - 2GB ram - ATI X800 Gto card) and had the following issuses

ATI video card is not working properly, i can&#039;t get direct rendering to work even after i followed all the instructions i found in the community forums

Flash player is not available for linux

Java Runtime is not available on 64bit

Emulating games under wine is frustrating

Adept manager crashed a few times 

There is no decent MP3 mixing software for linux (I also work as a DJ in a club)

There is no playchess.com client for linux (i have a paid account there)

Poker room clients are not available and running them through wine is not an option Most of them dont work, the few that work require an IE4Linux install+plugins, they incur into graphic problems, disconnections and they sometime crash)

P2P under linux isnt just the same - Joost for example is not available and Emule  clone&#039;s Amule is somewhat different

My bluetooth printer is not recognized

My PocketPC can&#039;t be synchronized

and i could go on with a lot of other issues, bugs, etc etc.

Besides, i dont care if iLinux is free, i got my Vista Ultimate as a birthday present (not that i couldnt afford it anyway), i am completely satisfied, it worked immediately on my system and haven&#039;t had a problem since. I have 24/7 support in case i need it, and malware and viruses are a problem just if you&#039;re an idiot, i haven&#039;t catched  a virus under windows in the past 18 months and the only trojan i got before (got it form a fake emule mp3) didnt harm my system.

Linux is a great OS for servers but at the desktop level is just for geeks and nerd wannabes and will never become a worthy alternative to Vista.

The simple fact that it&#039;s been around and available for free for the past 10+ years and yet the installed base is less than 1% should ring a bell to all you linux enthusiasts.

99% can&#039;t all be wrong or stupid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all forgive my english, but it&#8217;s not my mother language<br />
Now my 2 cents on the matter:<br />
Linux, in my opinion, as of may 2008 is not yet a OS worth looking at for the desktop.<br />
Let&#8217;s face it: linux is for geeks, the average layman does not want to spend hours scouring forums for solutions and writing tens of lines of apt-get, sudo, chmod, dpkg, modprobe etc, hoping this will solve the problem </p>
<p>The average layman wants a system that works out of the box not an OS where</p>
<p>I am not a computer illiterate, i&#8217;ve been using computers since i bought a sinclair spectrum in 1983, then i bought a C128 , two amigas, an apple and since 1995 have been using PCs everyday, i switch back and forth from linux at work to windows at home, yet today i wanted to try Kubuntu 8.04 64bit on my older pc (AMD64 4200 &#8211; 2GB ram &#8211; ATI X800 Gto card) and had the following issuses</p>
<p>ATI video card is not working properly, i can&#8217;t get direct rendering to work even after i followed all the instructions i found in the community forums</p>
<p>Flash player is not available for linux</p>
<p>Java Runtime is not available on 64bit</p>
<p>Emulating games under wine is frustrating</p>
<p>Adept manager crashed a few times </p>
<p>There is no decent MP3 mixing software for linux (I also work as a DJ in a club)</p>
<p>There is no playchess.com client for linux (i have a paid account there)</p>
<p>Poker room clients are not available and running them through wine is not an option Most of them dont work, the few that work require an IE4Linux install+plugins, they incur into graphic problems, disconnections and they sometime crash)</p>
<p>P2P under linux isnt just the same &#8211; Joost for example is not available and Emule  clone&#8217;s Amule is somewhat different</p>
<p>My bluetooth printer is not recognized</p>
<p>My PocketPC can&#8217;t be synchronized</p>
<p>and i could go on with a lot of other issues, bugs, etc etc.</p>
<p>Besides, i dont care if iLinux is free, i got my Vista Ultimate as a birthday present (not that i couldnt afford it anyway), i am completely satisfied, it worked immediately on my system and haven&#8217;t had a problem since. I have 24/7 support in case i need it, and malware and viruses are a problem just if you&#8217;re an idiot, i haven&#8217;t catched  a virus under windows in the past 18 months and the only trojan i got before (got it form a fake emule mp3) didnt harm my system.</p>
<p>Linux is a great OS for servers but at the desktop level is just for geeks and nerd wannabes and will never become a worthy alternative to Vista.</p>
<p>The simple fact that it&#8217;s been around and available for free for the past 10+ years and yet the installed base is less than 1% should ring a bell to all you linux enthusiasts.</p>
<p>99% can&#8217;t all be wrong or stupid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SomeGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-664934</link>
		<dc:creator>SomeGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/#comment-664934</guid>
		<description>This article is so true on so many level. Linux sucks! It&#039;s worse then Mac (No offense Mac users, it&#039;s just not my cup of Tea).

Linux Sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is so true on so many level. Linux sucks! It&#8217;s worse then Mac (No offense Mac users, it&#8217;s just not my cup of Tea).</p>
<p>Linux Sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SomeGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-664922</link>
		<dc:creator>SomeGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/#comment-664922</guid>
		<description>The gimp is a piece of crap, terrible interface, terrible controls. Photoshop is better in everyway possible, because you know it was made by people who weren&#039;t a bunch of 60&#039;s throwbacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The gimp is a piece of crap, terrible interface, terrible controls. Photoshop is better in everyway possible, because you know it was made by people who weren&#8217;t a bunch of 60&#8217;s throwbacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GJB</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-662757</link>
		<dc:creator>GJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/#comment-662757</guid>
		<description>@Anonymous: amazing how you&#039;ve implicitly agreed with many of my points. Emotion and not reason is driving your pro-Linux attitude, something you simply did not defend using a shred of rationality, but rather, again, only insults and ad hominem arguments.

At least you admitted you don&#039;t capitalism which is fine...just keep swimming upstream while the rest of society evolves in reality.

11. Linux users (really, the FSF types) despise the free market
12. Linux users&#039; ultimate argument is only they &quot;get it&quot; and the rest of the world &quot;is ignorant and must do more research&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anonymous: amazing how you&#8217;ve implicitly agreed with many of my points. Emotion and not reason is driving your pro-Linux attitude, something you simply did not defend using a shred of rationality, but rather, again, only insults and ad hominem arguments.</p>
<p>At least you admitted you don&#8217;t capitalism which is fine&#8230;just keep swimming upstream while the rest of society evolves in reality.</p>
<p>11. Linux users (really, the FSF types) despise the free market<br />
12. Linux users&#8217; ultimate argument is only they &#8220;get it&#8221; and the rest of the world &#8220;is ignorant and must do more research&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-662343</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/#comment-662343</guid>
		<description>...........

What the fuck? I&#039;m resulting to profanity because this truly requires that in the question. Also, what&#039;s so bad about profanity? Shove it up your republican arse, you hypocritical cunt sack.

First of all, I&#039;m not a zealot, I&#039;ll use any open source operating system. I&#039;ll use a BSD, Linux, or anything else Unix cloned/derived/inspired. But at the moment, I just use Linux, a debian derived distro, by the name of Ubuntu. Why do I use it? Because it has a pretty decent repository with mostly up to date software. After using Slackware for about 5 years and Gentoo for about 2 years.. Apt-Get combines both the pros of Slack and Gentoo in one fast, easy to use command when I just want to get dependencies such as libraries and codecs, rather then compiling them.  I don&#039;t use the default Gnome desktop envorinment, hell, I don&#039;t even use a &quot;desktop environment&quot;... I use the Openbox Window Manager... So I&#039;ll restate that, I&#039;m a zealot for FREE, FUNCTIONAL, OPEN software... not some proprietary, slow, outdated, closed, buggy as fuck software that I can&#039;t just go in and fix myself, I have to wait for some bullshit &quot;security package&quot; that breaks more shit then it fixes.

A huge reason you are hypocritical is that you are calling us rude, Cretans, inefficient... basically, you&#039;re labeling us all in this tight little niche. So go sodomize yourself with the broken end of a rusty aluminum broom stick. Sure, some &quot;linux users&quot; are Anti Establishment, and I perhaps fit in there, but look at how corrupt most of these douche bag companies are. I don&#039;t like capitalism, it makes me sick, it makes me immensely depressed on a daily basis. But this is just me, not all Linux users are like this. And anyone with an &quot;anti establishment&quot; persona has different reasons for why they are. So seriously, fuck off with putting us in this little fantasy niche of yours. 

Go do yourself some research and clear up your stupidity, but perhaps that wont even do you good, for stupidity can never be cured. Only Ignorance can, and this is far from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>What the fuck? I&#8217;m resulting to profanity because this truly requires that in the question. Also, what&#8217;s so bad about profanity? Shove it up your republican arse, you hypocritical cunt sack.</p>
<p>First of all, I&#8217;m not a zealot, I&#8217;ll use any open source operating system. I&#8217;ll use a BSD, Linux, or anything else Unix cloned/derived/inspired. But at the moment, I just use Linux, a debian derived distro, by the name of Ubuntu. Why do I use it? Because it has a pretty decent repository with mostly up to date software. After using Slackware for about 5 years and Gentoo for about 2 years.. Apt-Get combines both the pros of Slack and Gentoo in one fast, easy to use command when I just want to get dependencies such as libraries and codecs, rather then compiling them.  I don&#8217;t use the default Gnome desktop envorinment, hell, I don&#8217;t even use a &#8220;desktop environment&#8221;&#8230; I use the Openbox Window Manager&#8230; So I&#8217;ll restate that, I&#8217;m a zealot for FREE, FUNCTIONAL, OPEN software&#8230; not some proprietary, slow, outdated, closed, buggy as fuck software that I can&#8217;t just go in and fix myself, I have to wait for some bullshit &#8220;security package&#8221; that breaks more shit then it fixes.</p>
<p>A huge reason you are hypocritical is that you are calling us rude, Cretans, inefficient&#8230; basically, you&#8217;re labeling us all in this tight little niche. So go sodomize yourself with the broken end of a rusty aluminum broom stick. Sure, some &#8220;linux users&#8221; are Anti Establishment, and I perhaps fit in there, but look at how corrupt most of these douche bag companies are. I don&#8217;t like capitalism, it makes me sick, it makes me immensely depressed on a daily basis. But this is just me, not all Linux users are like this. And anyone with an &#8220;anti establishment&#8221; persona has different reasons for why they are. So seriously, fuck off with putting us in this little fantasy niche of yours. </p>
<p>Go do yourself some research and clear up your stupidity, but perhaps that wont even do you good, for stupidity can never be cured. Only Ignorance can, and this is far from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GJB</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-662187</link>
		<dc:creator>GJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 04:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/#comment-662187</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re dead on. I could go on for pages from a scientific and, perhaps even more relevantly, economic standpoint, but here&#039;s what I notice recurringly from a simple argumentative standpoint:

1. Linux users are zealots.
2. Linux users are close-minded
3. Most Linux users have less than 3 years experience in the industry. &quot;In the industry&quot; means that you&#039;ve at one point been actually paid to produce marketable software which of course requires an operating system. &quot;In the industry&quot; does not mean you have an iPod, found a codec, managed to boot Linux, have a blog with cute Ubuntu logos, etc.
4. Linux users are rude. They resort to profanity and insults. They are cretans
5. Linux users are countercultural
6. Linux users are anti-establishment (perhaps redundant of #5)
7. Linux users are inefficient. They&#039;d rather claim success to using a 10 year old boat anchor to run their latest favorite distro that took a week to find, attempt compilation, learn, tweak, fix, compile, repeat than simply get up and running within minutes on something that will last for at least the next three years and cost less than $500
8. Linux users are luddites. &quot;Command line!&quot; - &#039;nuff said
9. Linux users are naive as a function of what they claim. Ask simple questions like &quot;what&#039;s AIX?&quot; or &quot;ever hear of a P595?&quot; or &quot;what processors does an HP Superdome running HP-UX use?&quot; and you&#039;ll get blank stares at best, but more likely insults.
10. Linux users are myopic. If what is claimed to be nirvana for the desktop is in fact the &quot;way to go&quot;, then why not practice what one preaches and apply it everything? Find an open source, unsupported toaster, or a coffee table, or a vehicle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re dead on. I could go on for pages from a scientific and, perhaps even more relevantly, economic standpoint, but here&#8217;s what I notice recurringly from a simple argumentative standpoint:</p>
<p>1. Linux users are zealots.<br />
2. Linux users are close-minded<br />
3. Most Linux users have less than 3 years experience in the industry. &#8220;In the industry&#8221; means that you&#8217;ve at one point been actually paid to produce marketable software which of course requires an operating system. &#8220;In the industry&#8221; does not mean you have an iPod, found a codec, managed to boot Linux, have a blog with cute Ubuntu logos, etc.<br />
4. Linux users are rude. They resort to profanity and insults. They are cretans<br />
5. Linux users are countercultural<br />
6. Linux users are anti-establishment (perhaps redundant of #5)<br />
7. Linux users are inefficient. They&#8217;d rather claim success to using a 10 year old boat anchor to run their latest favorite distro that took a week to find, attempt compilation, learn, tweak, fix, compile, repeat than simply get up and running within minutes on something that will last for at least the next three years and cost less than $500<br />
8. Linux users are luddites. &#8220;Command line!&#8221; &#8211; &#8217;nuff said<br />
9. Linux users are naive as a function of what they claim. Ask simple questions like &#8220;what&#8217;s AIX?&#8221; or &#8220;ever hear of a P595?&#8221; or &#8220;what processors does an HP Superdome running HP-UX use?&#8221; and you&#8217;ll get blank stares at best, but more likely insults.<br />
10. Linux users are myopic. If what is claimed to be nirvana for the desktop is in fact the &#8220;way to go&#8221;, then why not practice what one preaches and apply it everything? Find an open source, unsupported toaster, or a coffee table, or a vehicle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sloshy</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-658142</link>
		<dc:creator>Sloshy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/#comment-658142</guid>
		<description>All I have to say is this: http://sloshy.livejournal.com/1598.html.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I have to say is this: <a href="http://sloshy.livejournal.com/1598.html." rel="nofollow">http://sloshy.livejournal.com/1598.html.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-648370</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/#comment-648370</guid>
		<description>Actually, I disagree with you. I installed Ubuntu and it&#039;s easy to use. All my hardware was recognized and it even installed additional codecs which aren&#039;t installed by default on Windows. It&#039;s free and my computer has never booted and shutdown faster. As for printing, no problems here. Even synching my cell phone works great... No games? No problem: I&#039;ve got an Xbox!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I disagree with you. I installed Ubuntu and it&#8217;s easy to use. All my hardware was recognized and it even installed additional codecs which aren&#8217;t installed by default on Windows. It&#8217;s free and my computer has never booted and shutdown faster. As for printing, no problems here. Even synching my cell phone works great&#8230; No games? No problem: I&#8217;ve got an Xbox!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin Coldewey</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-646661</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin Coldewey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/#comment-646661</guid>
		<description>And a good day to you! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And a good day to you! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woz</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-646388</link>
		<dc:creator>Woz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/#comment-646388</guid>
		<description>The whole column is a put-on, t0dk0n! Y&#039;know - like a joke? Lighten up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole column is a put-on, t0dk0n! Y&#8217;know &#8211; like a joke? Lighten up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woz</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-646385</link>
		<dc:creator>Woz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/#comment-646385</guid>
		<description>Steve? Steve Jobs? It IS you isn&#039;t Stevie!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve? Steve Jobs? It IS you isn&#8217;t Stevie!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t0dk0n</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-640112</link>
		<dc:creator>t0dk0n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/#comment-640112</guid>
		<description>Waste of my fucking time, you&#039;re an ill informed retard. The only reason Linux has no compatibility with games is because the greedy game companies want to go where the money is already established, that being, Windows. Right now, there really is no established way for some of these companies to make money from Linux, because they&#039;re not creative enough to realize all of the possibilities. Also, the source code for the games is so closed out, that no one can easily port them to Linux. Sooo, its not any of the developers, users,  system administrators, the whole group of Linux enthusiast faults for poor game compatibility.

Then with the developers.............. &quot;probably built up lego-style from stolen Windows code&quot;........... Fucking Windows code is done in Assembly, from what I understand. Look at the majority of projects done for Linux. They&#039;re usually C/++, Python, Perl, Lisp, Ruby, or some other obscure programming language I&#039;m sure you&#039;ve never heard of. But that&#039;s aside my point, you can tell that a lot of code is done from scratch or perhaps borrowed from another open source project when you see the different organization schemes of developers, perhaps cleaner code (but all code has bugs now and then), different algorithms, etc. Perhaps look at some code and see for yourself.  Also, it&#039;s very bold of you to even talk about programming, do you even know a thing about software development? From the sound of it, it surely looks like you don&#039;t. 

Now the command line... You OBVIOUSLY have to learn it before you can do just any old trick. It may be hard at first, but once you get the hang of it, it can be much more sufficient then the most intuitive of graphical user interfaces. But even then, you&#039;re not ever forced into using command line when you use Linux. You have a choice in exactly how you want your system to work for you. You even have the full power to make your own window managers, GUI&#039;s, etc to fit your needs or perhaps toggle some more ideas from the community.

I could go on, but why bother clearing up your ignorance for you? Go around and do yourself a bit more research before you start making such blatant assumptions and petty remarks. Good day to you, sir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waste of my fucking time, you&#8217;re an ill informed retard. The only reason Linux has no compatibility with games is because the greedy game companies want to go where the money is already established, that being, Windows. Right now, there really is no established way for some of these companies to make money from Linux, because they&#8217;re not creative enough to realize all of the possibilities. Also, the source code for the games is so closed out, that no one can easily port them to Linux. Sooo, its not any of the developers, users,  system administrators, the whole group of Linux enthusiast faults for poor game compatibility.</p>
<p>Then with the developers&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.. &#8220;probably built up lego-style from stolen Windows code&#8221;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.. Fucking Windows code is done in Assembly, from what I understand. Look at the majority of projects done for Linux. They&#8217;re usually C/++, Python, Perl, Lisp, Ruby, or some other obscure programming language I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve never heard of. But that&#8217;s aside my point, you can tell that a lot of code is done from scratch or perhaps borrowed from another open source project when you see the different organization schemes of developers, perhaps cleaner code (but all code has bugs now and then), different algorithms, etc. Perhaps look at some code and see for yourself.  Also, it&#8217;s very bold of you to even talk about programming, do you even know a thing about software development? From the sound of it, it surely looks like you don&#8217;t. </p>
<p>Now the command line&#8230; You OBVIOUSLY have to learn it before you can do just any old trick. It may be hard at first, but once you get the hang of it, it can be much more sufficient then the most intuitive of graphical user interfaces. But even then, you&#8217;re not ever forced into using command line when you use Linux. You have a choice in exactly how you want your system to work for you. You even have the full power to make your own window managers, GUI&#8217;s, etc to fit your needs or perhaps toggle some more ideas from the community.</p>
<p>I could go on, but why bother clearing up your ignorance for you? Go around and do yourself a bit more research before you start making such blatant assumptions and petty remarks. Good day to you, sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Hickey</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-631327</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/27/the-unreasonable-stance-linux-sucks/#comment-631327</guid>
		<description>I just... I mean... OMG. Really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just&#8230; I mean&#8230; OMG. Really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
