<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aircell gets FAA approval for WiFi in airplanes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/02/aircell-gets-faa-approval-for-wifi-in-airplanes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/02/aircell-gets-faa-approval-for-wifi-in-airplanes/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:37:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: VelocityWebDev</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/02/aircell-gets-faa-approval-for-wifi-in-airplanes/comment-page-1/#comment-651290</link>
		<dc:creator>VelocityWebDev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=24061#comment-651290</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s a cool idea - but doubtful that it will be very useable for anything beyond some email checking.  Frontier has had awesome DirecTV for sometime - however depending on flight location and tilt of the plane, the signal does go away.  It&#039;s hard to imagine that WiFi will be very strong from the ground to a plane flying at 37000 ft., but as with anything we will see!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a cool idea &#8211; but doubtful that it will be very useable for anything beyond some email checking.  Frontier has had awesome DirecTV for sometime &#8211; however depending on flight location and tilt of the plane, the signal does go away.  It&#8217;s hard to imagine that WiFi will be very strong from the ground to a plane flying at 37000 ft., but as with anything we will see!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/02/aircell-gets-faa-approval-for-wifi-in-airplanes/comment-page-1/#comment-636444</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=24061#comment-636444</guid>
		<description>I still don&#039;t believe in internet access within an airplane while it is airborne. There just is too much room for something to go wrong, i.e. receiving/sending terrorist signals. Also, with the way airline companies are jamming seats into airplanes, who has room to use their laptop? Only business and first class users will have access.
I bet that internet will be very expensive, almost as prohibitive as making an in-flight call.
I personally hope this never gets off the ground. I for one do not want to lose the last place where the internet is not out to get me (and work has no access to me either).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#8217;t believe in internet access within an airplane while it is airborne. There just is too much room for something to go wrong, i.e. receiving/sending terrorist signals. Also, with the way airline companies are jamming seats into airplanes, who has room to use their laptop? Only business and first class users will have access.<br />
I bet that internet will be very expensive, almost as prohibitive as making an in-flight call.<br />
I personally hope this never gets off the ground. I for one do not want to lose the last place where the internet is not out to get me (and work has no access to me either).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
