<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: World&#8217;s most powerful laser developed in Texas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/17/worlds-most-powerful-laser-developed-in-texas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/17/worlds-most-powerful-laser-developed-in-texas/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:28:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug Aamoth</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/17/worlds-most-powerful-laser-developed-in-texas/comment-page-1/#comment-661854</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Aamoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/17/worlds-most-powerful-laser-developed-in-texas/#comment-661854</guid>
		<description>Yeah. I wasn&#039;t quite sure how it could output all that energy with out using at least that much energy and then some. Seems impossible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. I wasn&#8217;t quite sure how it could output all that energy with out using at least that much energy and then some. Seems impossible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SwissFreek</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/17/worlds-most-powerful-laser-developed-in-texas/comment-page-1/#comment-661667</link>
		<dc:creator>SwissFreek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/17/worlds-most-powerful-laser-developed-in-texas/#comment-661667</guid>
		<description>Just to clarify my skepticism with you statement about solving the world&#039;s energy woes:

If you multiply the amount of power that that laser emits (1x10^15 watts) by the amount of time that it was emitting (1x10^-13 seconds = 1.667x10^-15 hours), you get 1.667 watt-hours. To put that into perspective, if you leave a 60-watt lightbulb on for an hour, that&#039;s 60 watt-hours. You 1000-watt PC power supply (at full capacity) for an hour, that&#039;s 1000 watt-hours (or 1 kilowatt-hour, the basic unit for which your power company charges you something like $0.10 or $0.15). SO, if you leave that 60-watt bulb on for an hour, it will consume 40 times the energy that this laser put out. Just. one. bulb.

What&#039;s more, the energy needs to come from somewhere. The laser didn&#039;t CREATE energy, it BURNED energy.

Long comment, I know, but that statement made my brain hurt. Let the engineers do the thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clarify my skepticism with you statement about solving the world&#8217;s energy woes:</p>
<p>If you multiply the amount of power that that laser emits (1&#215;10^15 watts) by the amount of time that it was emitting (1&#215;10^-13 seconds = 1.667&#215;10^-15 hours), you get 1.667 watt-hours. To put that into perspective, if you leave a 60-watt lightbulb on for an hour, that&#8217;s 60 watt-hours. You 1000-watt PC power supply (at full capacity) for an hour, that&#8217;s 1000 watt-hours (or 1 kilowatt-hour, the basic unit for which your power company charges you something like $0.10 or $0.15). SO, if you leave that 60-watt bulb on for an hour, it will consume 40 times the energy that this laser put out. Just. one. bulb.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, the energy needs to come from somewhere. The laser didn&#8217;t CREATE energy, it BURNED energy.</p>
<p>Long comment, I know, but that statement made my brain hurt. Let the engineers do the thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SwissFreek</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/17/worlds-most-powerful-laser-developed-in-texas/comment-page-1/#comment-661632</link>
		<dc:creator>SwissFreek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/17/worlds-most-powerful-laser-developed-in-texas/#comment-661632</guid>
		<description>&quot;Maybe, though, we could use the beam for energy since it’s more than 2,000 times the output of all power plants in the United States.&quot;

Uh... What?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Maybe, though, we could use the beam for energy since it’s more than 2,000 times the output of all power plants in the United States.&#8221;</p>
<p>Uh&#8230; What?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SwissFreek</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/17/worlds-most-powerful-laser-developed-in-texas/comment-page-1/#comment-661628</link>
		<dc:creator>SwissFreek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/17/worlds-most-powerful-laser-developed-in-texas/#comment-661628</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’m all for studying the universe, but maybe we could eradicate everyone’s home energy bills...&quot;

Funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m all for studying the universe, but maybe we could eradicate everyone’s home energy bills&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
