<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple drinking too much, wants to recreate Prodigy by way of Second Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/21/apple-drinking-too-much-wants-to-recreate-prodigy-by-way-of-second-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/21/apple-drinking-too-much-wants-to-recreate-prodigy-by-way-of-second-life/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:20:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: OldNews</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/21/apple-drinking-too-much-wants-to-recreate-prodigy-by-way-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-826028</link>
		<dc:creator>OldNews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=24990#comment-826028</guid>
		<description>Virtual shopping mall you say?

Welcome to 1993 at Bell Atlantic in Virginia.

http://www.businessweek.com/archives/1993/b333877.arc.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virtual shopping mall you say?</p>
<p>Welcome to 1993 at Bell Atlantic in Virginia.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/archives/1993/b333877.arc.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessweek.com/archives/1993/b333877.arc.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/21/apple-drinking-too-much-wants-to-recreate-prodigy-by-way-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-667582</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=24990#comment-667582</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard this idea being discussed for almost a decade now....not so sure it&#039;s the product of inebriation....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard this idea being discussed for almost a decade now&#8230;.not so sure it&#8217;s the product of inebriation&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csven</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/21/apple-drinking-too-much-wants-to-recreate-prodigy-by-way-of-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-667399</link>
		<dc:creator>csven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=24990#comment-667399</guid>
		<description>Unless you&#039;re familiar with how powerful the shopping urge/experience is for many people within Second Life you really can&#039;t understand what Apple is doing, in my opinion. Their stated goal of improving the &quot;social&quot; experience is dead on (and was a major point I argued with the no-social Kinset CTO).

Thing is, this level of interaction should, in my opinion, be considered too obvious for a patent award. I liken it to Amazon&#039;s &quot;1-Click&quot;. There are more far-reaching, less obvious virtual/real shopping ideas already in the public domain, including one of my own ( http://blog.rebang.com/?p=577 ). But unlike Apple, many of us have to more carefully weigh the cost/benefit of a patent application.

If I had corporate dollars and lawyers at my disposal I&#039;d have patented my idea and plenty of others. So it appears to me at least that we have yet another example of how deep pockets determine who &quot;owns&quot; innovation. And unlike Amazon, Apple has an army of fanboi&#039;s to defend whatever actions they take. Wonderful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless you&#8217;re familiar with how powerful the shopping urge/experience is for many people within Second Life you really can&#8217;t understand what Apple is doing, in my opinion. Their stated goal of improving the &#8220;social&#8221; experience is dead on (and was a major point I argued with the no-social Kinset CTO).</p>
<p>Thing is, this level of interaction should, in my opinion, be considered too obvious for a patent award. I liken it to Amazon&#8217;s &#8220;1-Click&#8221;. There are more far-reaching, less obvious virtual/real shopping ideas already in the public domain, including one of my own ( <a href="http://blog.rebang.com/?p=577" rel="nofollow">http://blog.rebang.com/?p=577</a> ). But unlike Apple, many of us have to more carefully weigh the cost/benefit of a patent application.</p>
<p>If I had corporate dollars and lawyers at my disposal I&#8217;d have patented my idea and plenty of others. So it appears to me at least that we have yet another example of how deep pockets determine who &#8220;owns&#8221; innovation. And unlike Amazon, Apple has an army of fanboi&#8217;s to defend whatever actions they take. Wonderful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
