<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Navigon 2100 Max GPS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/24/review-navigon-2100-max-gps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/24/review-navigon-2100-max-gps/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Gainey</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/24/review-navigon-2100-max-gps/#comment-909323</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Gainey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=25201#comment-909323</guid>
		<description>I was looking at this unit as an additional GPS to go along with my Fujitsu LOOX 100 which also uses the Navigon MN6 software. Until now. The 2100 MAX supposedly has a faster processor than the base 2100 which was supposed to overcome that "touch lag response" issue that is also found on the LOOX 100 running the Navigon software. Apparently this issue must be in the software if both systems developed over a two year period are exhibiting the same issue. I got an email solicitation today offering the 2100 Max on sale for $164. I thought it might be a good time to whip out the plastic. Now I'm not so sure. Not if it has the same laggy interface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking at this unit as an additional GPS to go along with my Fujitsu LOOX 100 which also uses the Navigon MN6 software. Until now. The 2100 MAX supposedly has a faster processor than the base 2100 which was supposed to overcome that &#8220;touch lag response&#8221; issue that is also found on the LOOX 100 running the Navigon software. Apparently this issue must be in the software if both systems developed over a two year period are exhibiting the same issue. I got an email solicitation today offering the 2100 Max on sale for $164. I thought it might be a good time to whip out the plastic. Now I&#8217;m not so sure. Not if it has the same laggy interface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.033 seconds -->
