<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ReviewGist.com Collates and Snips Product Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/24/reviewgistcom-collates-and-snips-product-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/24/reviewgistcom-collates-and-snips-product-reviews/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:10:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: batka</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/24/reviewgistcom-collates-and-snips-product-reviews/comment-page-1/#comment-672734</link>
		<dc:creator>batka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=25245#comment-672734</guid>
		<description>penis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>penis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francisco Gimenez</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/24/reviewgistcom-collates-and-snips-product-reviews/comment-page-1/#comment-672427</link>
		<dc:creator>Francisco Gimenez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=25245#comment-672427</guid>
		<description>They only have 5 expert reviews for the printer that John (comment #1)found. SmartRatings has 5x as many and it is easier to use:

http://www.smartratings.com/review/computers/printers/1509</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They only have 5 expert reviews for the printer that John (comment #1)found. SmartRatings has 5x as many and it is easier to use:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.smartratings.com/review/computers/printers/1509" rel="nofollow">http://www.smartratings.com/review/computers/printers/1509</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nishant</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/24/reviewgistcom-collates-and-snips-product-reviews/comment-page-1/#comment-672256</link>
		<dc:creator>nishant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 19:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=25245#comment-672256</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the detailed post John. 

Couple of quick comments around the specific points you raised - 

1.&quot; Kodak EASYSHARE 5300 InkJet Printer&quot; and &quot;Kodak EASYSHARE 5300 All-in-one InkJet Printer&quot; are the same products as far as we can tell- so in this case I think our analysis is rather accurate.

Matching names from different sources is a hard problem and is something we have spent considerable time upon. We don&#039;t claim to have solved the problem with 100% accuracy but we think it works pretty well for most cases.(and is this example also shows).

2. We do cover almost all expert review sources on the internet. The reason you saw more of cnet, zdnet is just because they have a ton more reviews than any other source out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the detailed post John. </p>
<p>Couple of quick comments around the specific points you raised &#8211; </p>
<p>1.&#8221; Kodak EASYSHARE 5300 InkJet Printer&#8221; and &#8220;Kodak EASYSHARE 5300 All-in-one InkJet Printer&#8221; are the same products as far as we can tell- so in this case I think our analysis is rather accurate.</p>
<p>Matching names from different sources is a hard problem and is something we have spent considerable time upon. We don&#8217;t claim to have solved the problem with 100% accuracy but we think it works pretty well for most cases.(and is this example also shows).</p>
<p>2. We do cover almost all expert review sources on the internet. The reason you saw more of cnet, zdnet is just because they have a ton more reviews than any other source out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
