<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T will subsidize 3G iPhone: As low as $199 for subscribers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/29/att-will-subsidize-3g-iphone-as-low-as-199-for-subscribers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/29/att-will-subsidize-3g-iphone-as-low-as-199-for-subscribers/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:29:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: It's me</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/29/att-will-subsidize-3g-iphone-as-low-as-199-for-subscribers/comment-page-1/#comment-693359</link>
		<dc:creator>It's me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 02:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=25564#comment-693359</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not an expert on these things, but I would guess that Apple isn&#039;t loosing any money here.  AT&amp;T would subsidize the phones meaning they are selling them at a loss.  The idea being that they would make the money back by drawing in new customers and on the cost of the plan that would be required for the iPhone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not an expert on these things, but I would guess that Apple isn&#8217;t loosing any money here.  AT&amp;T would subsidize the phones meaning they are selling them at a loss.  The idea being that they would make the money back by drawing in new customers and on the cost of the plan that would be required for the iPhone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/29/att-will-subsidize-3g-iphone-as-low-as-199-for-subscribers/comment-page-1/#comment-680168</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=25564#comment-680168</guid>
		<description>Seeing is believing...I&#039;ll wait till the decision is concrete...$200.00 isn&#039;t bad, but is Steve Jobs willing to lose $$$$$$$$$$. only time will tell...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing is believing&#8230;I&#8217;ll wait till the decision is concrete&#8230;$200.00 isn&#8217;t bad, but is Steve Jobs willing to lose $$$$$$$$$$. only time will tell&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/29/att-will-subsidize-3g-iphone-as-low-as-199-for-subscribers/comment-page-1/#comment-679059</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 03:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=25564#comment-679059</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t the original contract between Apple and AT&amp;T state that part of the exclusive deal meant that the iPhone price could not be subsidized? 

If so does this mean we will see the iPhone on other carriers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t the original contract between Apple and AT&amp;T state that part of the exclusive deal meant that the iPhone price could not be subsidized? </p>
<p>If so does this mean we will see the iPhone on other carriers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/29/att-will-subsidize-3g-iphone-as-low-as-199-for-subscribers/comment-page-1/#comment-679030</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 02:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=25564#comment-679030</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still not convinced that this is for real.  Fortune magazine has an unfortunate tendency to print random unconfirmed stuff that doesn&#039;t come true.

OtOH, if it is true, I&#039;ll be hard-pressed not to get one.  $500 is out of my price range, but $200 is just about right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still not convinced that this is for real.  Fortune magazine has an unfortunate tendency to print random unconfirmed stuff that doesn&#8217;t come true.</p>
<p>OtOH, if it is true, I&#8217;ll be hard-pressed not to get one.  $500 is out of my price range, but $200 is just about right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/04/29/att-will-subsidize-3g-iphone-as-low-as-199-for-subscribers/comment-page-1/#comment-678973</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=25564#comment-678973</guid>
		<description>Hmm...so, as a Verizon customer should I get a cheap ass AT&amp;T phone until the Iphone comes out and get the $200 credit? The only drawback is new customers of the Iphone get the lowest plan for $59.99 with unlimited data and internet. It is a $20 add on for existing subscribers. So, after 10 months the $200 savings would be nil. 

On second thought, ill just wait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;so, as a Verizon customer should I get a cheap ass AT&amp;T phone until the Iphone comes out and get the $200 credit? The only drawback is new customers of the Iphone get the lowest plan for $59.99 with unlimited data and internet. It is a $20 add on for existing subscribers. So, after 10 months the $200 savings would be nil. </p>
<p>On second thought, ill just wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
