I love it when people fight back against the RIAA. Their bullying tactics are getting old, and it seems the courts are realizing this. Last week a judge made it clear that making files available for download — seeding a file to a P2P network, for example — is not copyright infringement. There are other stories of people fighting back, and Atlantic vs. Boyer.
Boyer’s attorneys are being awesome and countersuing the RIAA for a number of offenses, and it’s a juicy, lovely list. The counter-suit states that the RIAA’s wrongdoings include civil conspiracy (to commit extortion, illegal investigations, and computer fraud), computer fraud and abuse, trespass, deceptive and unfair trade practices, declaratory judgment, and
abuse of process. Wow.
Sadly, the judge dismissed the countersuit, though that’s surprising. Hopefully Boyer’s attorneys will think of something else to screw the RIAA right where it hurts.
You’ve completely misread whatever you’ve been reading. The judge UPHELD the counterclaims against the RIAA.
I agree, screw the RIAA, they have bullied and extorted me all because I don’t have the finances to fight back and they know it. I wish someone would take them down, I’ll gladly join any effort on behalf of the people to stop this terrorism.