<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung readies the first 240Hz LCDs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/14/samsung-readies-the-first-240hz-lcds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/14/samsung-readies-the-first-240hz-lcds/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:55:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: neihrick</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/14/samsung-readies-the-first-240hz-lcds/comment-page-1/#comment-694186</link>
		<dc:creator>neihrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=26307#comment-694186</guid>
		<description>what will the refresh rate help if the response time is still high?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what will the refresh rate help if the response time is still high?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torben Busk</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/14/samsung-readies-the-first-240hz-lcds/comment-page-1/#comment-694097</link>
		<dc:creator>Torben Busk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=26307#comment-694097</guid>
		<description>Wow, that&#039;s a lot of Megahertz. Could you actually be meaning Hertz instead.

Since the frequency of the display is another way of telling how many times a second the picture i &#039;written/displayed&#039;, 240 Million times a second is a bit over the edge. 

Could I be wrong ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that&#8217;s a lot of Megahertz. Could you actually be meaning Hertz instead.</p>
<p>Since the frequency of the display is another way of telling how many times a second the picture i &#8216;written/displayed&#8217;, 240 Million times a second is a bit over the edge. </p>
<p>Could I be wrong ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
