<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will iPhone 2 get Intel&#8217;s Atom? Ja!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/14/will-iphone-2-get-intels-atom-ja/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/14/will-iphone-2-get-intels-atom-ja/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:53:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: xjw</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/14/will-iphone-2-get-intels-atom-ja/comment-page-1/#comment-694808</link>
		<dc:creator>xjw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 06:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=26317#comment-694808</guid>
		<description>john: 
don&#039;t think his statement was meant as an official announcement..  although the guy is german intel-ceo..   

chuck: 
the model is going to be larger than the current version. it&#039;s what the guy said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>john:<br />
don&#8217;t think his statement was meant as an official announcement..  although the guy is german intel-ceo..   </p>
<p>chuck:<br />
the model is going to be larger than the current version. it&#8217;s what the guy said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/14/will-iphone-2-get-intels-atom-ja/comment-page-1/#comment-694359</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 23:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=26317#comment-694359</guid>
		<description>Just cause the display is 720x480 does not mean the phone is any larger or more streched.  You also need to know the dot pitch.  Depending on the dot pitch the new display could be any size or shape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just cause the display is 720&#215;480 does not mean the phone is any larger or more streched.  You also need to know the dot pitch.  Depending on the dot pitch the new display could be any size or shape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Biggs</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/14/will-iphone-2-get-intels-atom-ja/comment-page-1/#comment-694299</link>
		<dc:creator>John Biggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 22:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=26317#comment-694299</guid>
		<description>did he say this &quot;officially?
&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did he say this &#8220;officially?<br />
&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xjw</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/14/will-iphone-2-get-intels-atom-ja/comment-page-1/#comment-694271</link>
		<dc:creator>xjw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=26317#comment-694271</guid>
		<description>basically the article says: 

intel-exec states 
yes,
there will be a atom-based iphone. 
display resolution will be 720x480, causing the phone to be slighty larger than the old model.
still the old model will be continued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>basically the article says: </p>
<p>intel-exec states<br />
yes,<br />
there will be a atom-based iphone.<br />
display resolution will be 720&#215;480, causing the phone to be slighty larger than the old model.<br />
still the old model will be continued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/14/will-iphone-2-get-intels-atom-ja/comment-page-1/#comment-694197</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=26317#comment-694197</guid>
		<description>To date, most (believable) rumors have implied that this upcoming iteration of the iPhone will be a minor bump to 3G with increased capacity, and maybe a second camera on the front.  I&#039;m skeptical that they would be switching processors and changing resolution at this point.  Both of those changes would require significant updates to the iPhone software and make backwards compatibility difficult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To date, most (believable) rumors have implied that this upcoming iteration of the iPhone will be a minor bump to 3G with increased capacity, and maybe a second camera on the front.  I&#8217;m skeptical that they would be switching processors and changing resolution at this point.  Both of those changes would require significant updates to the iPhone software and make backwards compatibility difficult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
