<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SlingModem officially announced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/15/slingmodem-officially-announced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/15/slingmodem-officially-announced/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: weatherman</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/15/slingmodem-officially-announced/#comment-695302</link>
		<dc:creator>weatherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 15:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/15/slingmodem-officially-announced/#comment-695302</guid>
		<description>So would this allow people at home to watch something different than the person watching remotely? That's not possible with the current Slings, right?

Even though I consider myself an early adopter, I've been a little scared by the Sling. My AV system is already a mess of wires and remotes, and the idea of adding another device in the middle of it all is just a little too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So would this allow people at home to watch something different than the person watching remotely? That&#8217;s not possible with the current Slings, right?</p>
<p>Even though I consider myself an early adopter, I&#8217;ve been a little scared by the Sling. My AV system is already a mess of wires and remotes, and the idea of adding another device in the middle of it all is just a little too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.034 seconds -->
