<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1983: Byte Magazine reviews the very first Compaq clone PC - 28 pounds and portable!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/16/1983-byte-magazine-reviews-the-very-first-compaq-clone-pc-28-pounds-and-portable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/16/1983-byte-magazine-reviews-the-very-first-compaq-clone-pc-28-pounds-and-portable/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/16/1983-byte-magazine-reviews-the-very-first-compaq-clone-pc-28-pounds-and-portable/#comment-697936</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 06:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=26473#comment-697936</guid>
		<description>I cut my teeth as a tech working on these things when they first came out.  They were great, and their owners loved them.  Even after they were obsolete, I would see them tucked away, purring along in industrial environments as data acquisition or industrial control boxes.

They were extremely reliable, most of the work I would do on them were upgrades, such as replacing the 10 Mb drive with a big ol' 20 or even 40 Mb drive.  Only rarely did I have to do any warranty work such as replace the power supply or maybe a system board.

We called them such names as "luggables", "suitcases" or "sewing machines".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cut my teeth as a tech working on these things when they first came out.  They were great, and their owners loved them.  Even after they were obsolete, I would see them tucked away, purring along in industrial environments as data acquisition or industrial control boxes.</p>
<p>They were extremely reliable, most of the work I would do on them were upgrades, such as replacing the 10 Mb drive with a big ol&#8217; 20 or even 40 Mb drive.  Only rarely did I have to do any warranty work such as replace the power supply or maybe a system board.</p>
<p>We called them such names as &#8220;luggables&#8221;, &#8220;suitcases&#8221; or &#8220;sewing machines&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Haggerty</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/16/1983-byte-magazine-reviews-the-very-first-compaq-clone-pc-28-pounds-and-portable/#comment-696643</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Haggerty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 03:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=26473#comment-696643</guid>
		<description>We had one of those babies when I was younger.  It was pretty sweet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had one of those babies when I was younger.  It was pretty sweet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.267 seconds -->
