<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The sad saga of MrBabyMan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/18/the-sad-saga-of-mrbabyman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/18/the-sad-saga-of-mrbabyman/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TheRedMonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/18/the-sad-saga-of-mrbabyman/#comment-698530</link>
		<dc:creator>TheRedMonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 18:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=26522#comment-698530</guid>
		<description>This article is crap because it even states he reposts stuff when articles are not doing well.  That means they make it due to his popularity scheme.  I have seen it time and time again on digg where he reposts and it gets popular or its just a crap article.  It may not be his fault but it still sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is crap because it even states he reposts stuff when articles are not doing well.  That means they make it due to his popularity scheme.  I have seen it time and time again on digg where he reposts and it gets popular or its just a crap article.  It may not be his fault but it still sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.039 seconds -->
