<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple&#8230; and CBS?&#8230; sued over Mighty Mouse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/21/apple-and-cbs-sued-over-mighty-mouse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/21/apple-and-cbs-sued-over-mighty-mouse/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:09:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Campbell</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/21/apple-and-cbs-sued-over-mighty-mouse/comment-page-1/#comment-703197</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 18:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=26697#comment-703197</guid>
		<description>Just a FYI. A movie or song or book name cannot be trademarked or have a copyright attached. Hence numerous songs with the same name - especially love songs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a FYI. A movie or song or book name cannot be trademarked or have a copyright attached. Hence numerous songs with the same name &#8211; especially love songs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/21/apple-and-cbs-sued-over-mighty-mouse/comment-page-1/#comment-703026</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 15:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=26697#comment-703026</guid>
		<description>Someone needs to brush up on your Trademark Law... because there ARE exceptions for names that have an inherent value.

For example: If I make a product called &quot;Rough Cut&quot; the makers of the 1980 Burt Reynolds film will have no claim because the name &quot;Rough Cut&quot; doesn&#039;t evoke a particular image. If, however, I make a product and try to call it &quot;Gone With The Wind&quot; or &quot;From Here to Eternity&quot; I will get sued to oblivion.

&quot;Mighty Mouse&quot; is a well known, unique combination of words used in trade for a multitude of products (not JUST cartoons). As a category for computer mice didn&#039;t EXIST when the mark was granted, and the mark is still being used in trade, the owners of the mark (CBS) has a claim if they can prove that the use of those two words in that order evokes products made by them or their licensees. 

So, why doesn&#039;t Dominos Pizza get sued by Domino Sugar? Because the average person identifies the word &quot;Domino&quot; with a small tile used in a game.

Likewise Pep Boys CAN get sued for selling &quot;Big Macs&quot; in a tire promotion, even though McDonald&#039;s doesn&#039;t sell auto parts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone needs to brush up on your Trademark Law&#8230; because there ARE exceptions for names that have an inherent value.</p>
<p>For example: If I make a product called &#8220;Rough Cut&#8221; the makers of the 1980 Burt Reynolds film will have no claim because the name &#8220;Rough Cut&#8221; doesn&#8217;t evoke a particular image. If, however, I make a product and try to call it &#8220;Gone With The Wind&#8221; or &#8220;From Here to Eternity&#8221; I will get sued to oblivion.</p>
<p>&#8220;Mighty Mouse&#8221; is a well known, unique combination of words used in trade for a multitude of products (not JUST cartoons). As a category for computer mice didn&#8217;t EXIST when the mark was granted, and the mark is still being used in trade, the owners of the mark (CBS) has a claim if they can prove that the use of those two words in that order evokes products made by them or their licensees. </p>
<p>So, why doesn&#8217;t Dominos Pizza get sued by Domino Sugar? Because the average person identifies the word &#8220;Domino&#8221; with a small tile used in a game.</p>
<p>Likewise Pep Boys CAN get sued for selling &#8220;Big Macs&#8221; in a tire promotion, even though McDonald&#8217;s doesn&#8217;t sell auto parts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
