<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sharp announces tiny 5-megapixel CMOS camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/22/sharp-announces-tiny-5-megapixel-cmos-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/22/sharp-announces-tiny-5-megapixel-cmos-camera/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:49:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dwalk51</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/22/sharp-announces-tiny-5-megapixel-cmos-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-707604</link>
		<dc:creator>dwalk51</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 17:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/22/sharp-announces-tiny-5-megapixel-cmos-camera/#comment-707604</guid>
		<description>Well, I *think* there is a more official term for &#039;noise levels&#039; but it escapes me at the moment. And good sir, do you see any extremely grainy pictures from camera-phones now? Generally speaking, no. Sure there is always going to be some crappy quality somewhere, but if a company takes the time to develop an itty-bitty camera, *I* would think that they would also take the time to iron out any kinks such as... grainy photos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I *think* there is a more official term for &#8216;noise levels&#8217; but it escapes me at the moment. And good sir, do you see any extremely grainy pictures from camera-phones now? Generally speaking, no. Sure there is always going to be some crappy quality somewhere, but if a company takes the time to develop an itty-bitty camera, *I* would think that they would also take the time to iron out any kinks such as&#8230; grainy photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whiskey</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/22/sharp-announces-tiny-5-megapixel-cmos-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-706554</link>
		<dc:creator>Whiskey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 00:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/22/sharp-announces-tiny-5-megapixel-cmos-camera/#comment-706554</guid>
		<description>Not to be the sound of dissent, given that everybody seems to understand and actually like this, but what about noise levels? Or will it be just one crappy  CMOS that crams tons of info plus noise on your memories?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to be the sound of dissent, given that everybody seems to understand and actually like this, but what about noise levels? Or will it be just one crappy  CMOS that crams tons of info plus noise on your memories?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dwalk51</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/22/sharp-announces-tiny-5-megapixel-cmos-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-705019</link>
		<dc:creator>dwalk51</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 22:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/22/sharp-announces-tiny-5-megapixel-cmos-camera/#comment-705019</guid>
		<description>Humph. The iPhones sure to trump that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Humph. The iPhones sure to trump that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/22/sharp-announces-tiny-5-megapixel-cmos-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-704869</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 20:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/22/sharp-announces-tiny-5-megapixel-cmos-camera/#comment-704869</guid>
		<description>Cool, I can do my own rectal exam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, I can do my own rectal exam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Aamoth</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/22/sharp-announces-tiny-5-megapixel-cmos-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-704612</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Aamoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/22/sharp-announces-tiny-5-megapixel-cmos-camera/#comment-704612</guid>
		<description>It&#039;ll just get smaller. People probably look at your current phone and say, &quot;Whoa, huge camera module, huh?! What&#039;s that thing, like, 10 millimeters square?&quot; Those kind of comments from passers-by will slowly start to go away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll just get smaller. People probably look at your current phone and say, &#8220;Whoa, huge camera module, huh?! What&#8217;s that thing, like, 10 millimeters square?&#8221; Those kind of comments from passers-by will slowly start to go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/22/sharp-announces-tiny-5-megapixel-cmos-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-704609</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/22/sharp-announces-tiny-5-megapixel-cmos-camera/#comment-704609</guid>
		<description>But my phone already has a 5-megapixel auto-focusing camera :confused:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But my phone already has a 5-megapixel auto-focusing camera :confused:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
