<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel says USB 3 on its way, despite AMD and Nvidia&#8217;s complaints</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/06/12/intel-says-usb-3-on-its-way-despite-amd-and-nvidias-complaints/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/06/12/intel-says-usb-3-on-its-way-despite-amd-and-nvidias-complaints/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/06/12/intel-says-usb-3-on-its-way-despite-amd-and-nvidias-complaints/#comment-780890</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=28128#comment-780890</guid>
		<description>Im not sure how long it takes, but to say copy 10 albums in flac to a PMP device, thats about 5Gb.. then you have the same quality on your pmp as in your archive, no need to mess around with files and make lower quality mp3 files.

Also moving a 100Gb or more to an external drive would be nice if it was as fast as possible, letting the harddrive become the bottleneck instead of the interface..

Since external disks with firewire 800 or even old firewire 400 is moving data faster than USB2 then the inteface has beome a bottleneck.. wich is not good since HDD's will only become faster over time and the bottleneck will become worse.. its good if we see USB3 soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im not sure how long it takes, but to say copy 10 albums in flac to a PMP device, thats about 5Gb.. then you have the same quality on your pmp as in your archive, no need to mess around with files and make lower quality mp3 files.</p>
<p>Also moving a 100Gb or more to an external drive would be nice if it was as fast as possible, letting the harddrive become the bottleneck instead of the interface..</p>
<p>Since external disks with firewire 800 or even old firewire 400 is moving data faster than USB2 then the inteface has beome a bottleneck.. wich is not good since HDD&#8217;s will only become faster over time and the bottleneck will become worse.. its good if we see USB3 soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dwalk51</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/06/12/intel-says-usb-3-on-its-way-despite-amd-and-nvidias-complaints/#comment-733123</link>
		<dc:creator>dwalk51</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 01:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=28128#comment-733123</guid>
		<description>About the fastness of your touch:
1) It's a flash storage device, and as pretty much all flash storage devices, its fast as hell anyway.
2) A movie for iPod touch viewing can't be over 1GB at most.
Now consider people who:
1) Use an external hard drive through USB to back up their computer
2) Load movies onto their hard drive based iPods
3) Do anything that speed would be nice in involving USB.

Gotcha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About the fastness of your touch:<br />
1) It&#8217;s a flash storage device, and as pretty much all flash storage devices, its fast as hell anyway.<br />
2) A movie for iPod touch viewing can&#8217;t be over 1GB at most.<br />
Now consider people who:<br />
1) Use an external hard drive through USB to back up their computer<br />
2) Load movies onto their hard drive based iPods<br />
3) Do anything that speed would be nice in involving USB.</p>
<p>Gotcha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.184 seconds -->
