<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T considering bandwidth caps for DSL customers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/06/13/att-considering-bandwidth-caps-for-dsl-customers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/06/13/att-considering-bandwidth-caps-for-dsl-customers/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:01:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: james green</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/06/13/att-considering-bandwidth-caps-for-dsl-customers/comment-page-1/#comment-783469</link>
		<dc:creator>james green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=28181#comment-783469</guid>
		<description>What I don&#039;t understand is that if you or I pay for 1.5 mbps. download and I can never seem to download that fast.
Then no matter how much I download I am never going over what I pay for. Like DSL, If everyone purchased 1.5 mbps and never exceeded the downloaded bandwidth, then how can AT&amp;T complain. Or are they selling something to people they cannot deliver on. As far as I am concerned if I purchase 1.5 mbps, I should be able to download 1.5 mbps 24 hrs, 7 days a week and so should anyone else that purchases it. They set the limits when they sell their service and now they want to complain about it. And to end this, when you or I purchase something, isn&#039;t up to us what we do with what we purchase. Are those who speak to long on the phone next? This is nothing more than the rich trying to take more from the poor people like they havn&#039;t taken enough already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I don&#8217;t understand is that if you or I pay for 1.5 mbps. download and I can never seem to download that fast.<br />
Then no matter how much I download I am never going over what I pay for. Like DSL, If everyone purchased 1.5 mbps and never exceeded the downloaded bandwidth, then how can AT&amp;T complain. Or are they selling something to people they cannot deliver on. As far as I am concerned if I purchase 1.5 mbps, I should be able to download 1.5 mbps 24 hrs, 7 days a week and so should anyone else that purchases it. They set the limits when they sell their service and now they want to complain about it. And to end this, when you or I purchase something, isn&#8217;t up to us what we do with what we purchase. Are those who speak to long on the phone next? This is nothing more than the rich trying to take more from the poor people like they havn&#8217;t taken enough already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WT</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/06/13/att-considering-bandwidth-caps-for-dsl-customers/comment-page-1/#comment-733947</link>
		<dc:creator>WT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=28181#comment-733947</guid>
		<description>I use ATT instead of Comcast only because they do not hassle me when I download TV shows and movies from iTunes.  If they choose to limit downloads then I have no reason to continue to use their DSL, or keep a land line for that matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use ATT instead of Comcast only because they do not hassle me when I download TV shows and movies from iTunes.  If they choose to limit downloads then I have no reason to continue to use their DSL, or keep a land line for that matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
