<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today&#8217;s a good day to upgrade your video card</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/06/20/todays-a-good-day-to-upgrade-your-video-card/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/06/20/todays-a-good-day-to-upgrade-your-video-card/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:20:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Devin Coldewey</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/06/20/todays-a-good-day-to-upgrade-your-video-card/comment-page-1/#comment-742877</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin Coldewey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=28566#comment-742877</guid>
		<description>Good call - it said in the intro that it they expected lower temperatures, but I forgot that in the end they found Nvidia had clocked it up enough to eliminate those gains. Thanks for keeping me honest.

Although the newer fabrication techniques rely on techs to lower power leakage, so I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if while it took more power in, its efficiency is far better and it runs a little cooler. I could totally be wrong though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good call &#8211; it said in the intro that it they expected lower temperatures, but I forgot that in the end they found Nvidia had clocked it up enough to eliminate those gains. Thanks for keeping me honest.</p>
<p>Although the newer fabrication techniques rely on techs to lower power leakage, so I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if while it took more power in, its efficiency is far better and it runs a little cooler. I could totally be wrong though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fence</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/06/20/todays-a-good-day-to-upgrade-your-video-card/comment-page-1/#comment-742856</link>
		<dc:creator>Fence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=28566#comment-742856</guid>
		<description>The article you linked to says the 9800GTX+ uses MORE power than the non-plus, so it probably doesn&#039;t run cooler.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article you linked to says the 9800GTX+ uses MORE power than the non-plus, so it probably doesn&#8217;t run cooler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
