Know something we should know? E-mail us your tips! We respect anonymity. »
Better a dead Symbian than an open one
  • 1 Comment
by John Biggs on June 25, 2008


Livin’ on the high end.

TheRegister makes an interesting point: Symbian is dead. Once Nokia bought and decided to open-source it you can be certain that it will end up in low-end, developing market phones and not any of Nokia’s flagship models. It can’t simply because the OS and UI are twenty years old and far too klunky to offer any wow to a jaded populace.

Now that anything can essentially run anything, Symbian is just a phone OS, not a smartphone OS. Even the definition of “smartphone” has changed. Was the iPhone a smartphone in its 1.x stage? No. It was basically a souped up RAZR. The industry is swiftly moving towards taking better care of their software and letting the hardware stay stagnant. After all, who needs a fast phone if you can’t sanely delete 500 messages from your inbox?

Comments rss icon

  • There’s a lot of truth to this.

    I have a cheesy Nokia “dumb” phone and, while the feature list is impressive, actually being able to use those features is a nightmare.

    Please, please, please spend more time and effort on the software. The bullet list is fine. Leave the hardware alone. Give the software some love.

Leave Comment

Commenting Options

Enter your personal information to the left, or sign in with your Facebook account by clicking the button below.

Alternatively, you can create an avatar that will appear whenever you leave a comment on a Gravatar-enabled blog.

bugbugbug