<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hasselblad&#8217;s H3D-II 50 has 50 megapixels just for you</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/08/hasselblads-h3d-ii-50-has-50-megapixels-just-for-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/08/hasselblads-h3d-ii-50-has-50-megapixels-just-for-you/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: balaji</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/08/hasselblads-h3d-ii-50-has-50-megapixels-just-for-you/#comment-792938</link>
		<dc:creator>balaji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 04:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=29424#comment-792938</guid>
		<description>super</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>super</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erich</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/08/hasselblads-h3d-ii-50-has-50-megapixels-just-for-you/#comment-762565</link>
		<dc:creator>Erich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=29424#comment-762565</guid>
		<description>??  Maybe I'm reading your update wrong.  The Hasselblad is using the kodak sensor.  What is there to compare between the two?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>??  Maybe I&#8217;m reading your update wrong.  The Hasselblad is using the kodak sensor.  What is there to compare between the two?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.380 seconds -->
