<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung producing 128GB SSDs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/09/samsung-producing-128gb-ssds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/09/samsung-producing-128gb-ssds/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:37:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: thebonafortuna</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/09/samsung-producing-128gb-ssds/comment-page-1/#comment-762520</link>
		<dc:creator>thebonafortuna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/09/samsung-producing-128gb-ssds/#comment-762520</guid>
		<description>Doug (and community),

It seems like every comparison I&#039;ve read has concluded that these things just aren&#039;t all that much better than a standard SATA drive.  Battery life, performance, everything except durability.

Are they really that much better?  Enough to justify the outlandish pricing?  I like getting 320 GB or storage for $80, and haven&#039;t had any problems buying Seagate or Samsung.  It seems like these things are more a commodity right now, opposed to offering real value (which I recognize will come later).

Seems like they&#039;re not delivering on the expectations which were set (perhaps unfairly) for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug (and community),</p>
<p>It seems like every comparison I&#8217;ve read has concluded that these things just aren&#8217;t all that much better than a standard SATA drive.  Battery life, performance, everything except durability.</p>
<p>Are they really that much better?  Enough to justify the outlandish pricing?  I like getting 320 GB or storage for $80, and haven&#8217;t had any problems buying Seagate or Samsung.  It seems like these things are more a commodity right now, opposed to offering real value (which I recognize will come later).</p>
<p>Seems like they&#8217;re not delivering on the expectations which were set (perhaps unfairly) for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
