<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Britain looks to ban Revolution for DS ‘homebrew’ card</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/10/britain-looks-to-ban-revolution-for-ds-%e2%80%98homebrew%e2%80%99-card/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/10/britain-looks-to-ban-revolution-for-ds-%e2%80%98homebrew%e2%80%99-card/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, gear and computer hardware.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:58:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KDM</title>
		<link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/10/britain-looks-to-ban-revolution-for-ds-%e2%80%98homebrew%e2%80%99-card/comment-page-1/#comment-836655</link>
		<dc:creator>KDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crunchgear.com/?p=29587#comment-836655</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... Wonder why they&#039;re picking on the R4 in particular? There are at least 3 other development carts popularised here in the UK. I can&#039;t see how the cards can be illegal. I may be naive, but I&#039;m not convinced (as the linked article states) that they inherently &quot;...illegally circumvent the copyright protection in place...&quot;

Surely the illegal acts are in making available and downloading the copyrighted material?

I possess the DSTT card and use it to run homebrew games and apps. I perceive this to be perfectly legitimate and my conscience is absolutely clear. I actively encourage and voluntarily support the development of this software: it&#039;s no different than individuals who wish to write their own software for a PC. Much like the PC and other platforms, folk will, in time, come to realise that buying an operating system or a game from a profit-making organisation is such a shocking waste when there are perfectly good software suites available as freeware and shareware.

That aside, my DS is heavily used as a digital photo frame: In addition to freeware, my micro SD card is loaded up with photos and videos of my kids.

I can&#039;t see how I&#039;m breaking the law, but if someone can tell me otherwise, or explain why I&#039;m mistaken, I&#039;m prepared to  reconsider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; Wonder why they&#8217;re picking on the R4 in particular? There are at least 3 other development carts popularised here in the UK. I can&#8217;t see how the cards can be illegal. I may be naive, but I&#8217;m not convinced (as the linked article states) that they inherently &#8220;&#8230;illegally circumvent the copyright protection in place&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Surely the illegal acts are in making available and downloading the copyrighted material?</p>
<p>I possess the DSTT card and use it to run homebrew games and apps. I perceive this to be perfectly legitimate and my conscience is absolutely clear. I actively encourage and voluntarily support the development of this software: it&#8217;s no different than individuals who wish to write their own software for a PC. Much like the PC and other platforms, folk will, in time, come to realise that buying an operating system or a game from a profit-making organisation is such a shocking waste when there are perfectly good software suites available as freeware and shareware.</p>
<p>That aside, my DS is heavily used as a digital photo frame: In addition to freeware, my micro SD card is loaded up with photos and videos of my kids.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t see how I&#8217;m breaking the law, but if someone can tell me otherwise, or explain why I&#8217;m mistaken, I&#8217;m prepared to  reconsider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
